Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20993

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose Bill 66 for a number of reasons. 1) I am disturbed that there is no way for citizens to appeal open-for-business by-laws to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20995

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Sierra Club Ontario - Peel Group submission to EBR registry re Bill 66 I am writing this submission as Director of Sierra Club Ontario - Peel Group. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21001

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please o NOT open our Green Belt for development, with this Bill. Bill 66 will put 2 two million acres of natural areas, habitats and wetlands at risk of development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21002

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is a catastrophe waiting to happen. It trashes the environmental protections that we put in place over decades - I was involved in the 1970s! - leaving the water we drink, the air we breathe, the food we eat to be poisoned for profit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21003

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned about this bill. It appears that the provincial government has proposed to allow the development of protected areas such as the greenbelt and the Oak Ridges Moraine and removing environmental protections in sensitive areas. I disagree with this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 if passed will spell DISASTER for Ontario! It certainly is not in the interests of the environment or most people of Ontario; it is strictly in the interest of businesses and opens many of our waterways and Great Lakes to contamination and destruction by them. Why would we allow that? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21007

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support bill 66. This bill, as proposed, will threaten Ontario's water, farmland, natural and environmentally sensitive areas. It would circumvent vital protections for water, land animals and people. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21010

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I spend time in two very different municipalities in Ontario . One is mostly rural and the other is in a municipality with some of the worst air quality in Ontario. I therefore have a vested interest in every issue in this poorly thought out piece of proposed leglislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21011

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

2019-01-20 Re: Bill 66 – Ontario Provincial Government Proposed legislation Recommendation: That the South Lake Simcoe Naturalists recommend the Province of Ontario immediately abandon this legislation and implore that they not proceed to try and pass Bill 66 in the Ontario legislature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21013

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I join several progressive municipalities in their opposition to this regressive legislation, including the City of Hamilton and the City of Guelph. (See website links). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21014

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any part of Bill 66. It will usher in policy that endangers the environment as well as the physical well-being of all those who depend on the environment to live (in case you aren’t aware, that is all of us). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21016

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Reducing child care adult-to-child ratios is not about creating affordable child care spots and is absolutely unsafe, irresponsible, profiting at the expense of children. This government should be ashamed that it values private business profit over child safety. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21017

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This legislation contradicts what Doug Ford said during the election campaign - that he would not touch the Greenbelt! Bill 66 undermines evidence-based city planning, threatens drinking water and removes protection from toxic chemicals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21018

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Premier Ford promised to protect our green spaces in and around the GTA after first musing about developing them. Now he has broken his election promise. This consultation is just a preamble for allowing big business to pave over our precious countryside. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21021

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a concerned and committed citizen of Ontario, I appeal to our provincial government to repeal Bill 66 and leave in place theToxics Reduction Act, 2009. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21024

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Archaeologist, I fear this Bill will be a detriment to my career. What I am certain of is that this Bill will be a detriment to the culture that is still evident within the soil of this land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We must continue to protect and preserve our environment and any laws negating that, should be considered preposterous. This bill would be destroying the safety procedures we have put in place and would be even going as far as working on restricted and protected land. Lire davantage