Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81209

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

By halving the maximum alternative parkland dedication rate, this will reduce the amount of parkland that residents will have to enjoy. Already the amount of community space within subdivisions is quite small. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81217

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

By reducing development costs by regulating that municipalities phase in new development charge rates that decrease costs for developers, change the time that a development charge by-law from 5 years to 10 years (decreasing the number of times that the development charge can be updated/increased), t Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81218

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Reducing and eliminating development charges is a form of magical thinking – as if all the developer has to do is build houses and water, waste water, electricity and roads will magically appear. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81234

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 eliminates environmental assessments and previous legislation for projects currently underway in Ontario. Bill 23 allows development in Greenbelts and reduces arable land close to cities, destroying wetland and woodlands, stressing native fauna and increasing water drainage problems.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81239

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While I generally agree with intensification actions of the proposal within previously existing urban boundaries (before the government recently added farm and other lands to the urban boundaries) I don't agree with the rest. There are 4 groups whose criticisms I agree with. They are: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81242

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

- These steps do not follow the recommendations of the the Housing Affordability Task Force Report, which recommended the establishment of an “Ontario Housing Delivery Fund” to incentivize municipalities to build more homes (p24). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81247

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Also of particular importance is the part of Schedule 3 that deals with parkland dedication. It would cut the amount of parkland that must be set aside by developers by 50%. Parks are one of the most important kinds of greenspace for urban residents and they are already in short supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments about the proposed changes to the Planning Act and Development Charges Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81269

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The stated purpose of the proposed changes to the Planning Act and Development Charges Act are to help everyone in Ontario "find a home that is right for them" ... "housing that meets their family's needs" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81270

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill proposal is ridiculous. Can you imagine a neighbourhood of 600 homes with one park! I don't want our municipality to sprawl out into the agricultural land around our city. We have enough land inside the city to support low-income housing. We just need to build up, not out. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81273

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Affordable housing units would also be exempt from parkland dedication requirements. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81276

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Renters living in purpose-built rentals are more at risk of being evicted. The government is giving itself permission to ban and restrict city rules that requires developers to return a tenant to their rent-controlled apartment after construction of the new bigger condo is complete. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81287

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very disturbed by the proposal to reduce development costs, and believe it will ultimately defeat the stated goal of everyone in Ontario finding a home that is right for them, and which "meets their family's needs" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81300

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose and I hope you will rethink the negative impact your actions will have.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81306

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are so many issues with Bill 23 the entire Bill needs to be reviewed thoroughly with enough time for citizens to properly comment on the sections that matter most to them. I feel strongly that the omnibus bill and the speed by which it was passed are undemocratic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81315

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is irresponsible to biodiversity and residents: Why: • It is wrong that the amount of land for parkland designation is going to be cut in half and limiting the % of land that can be dedicated for parkland. It is wrong to freeze parkland dedication rates. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The province seems to not have done their research. Cities are not for profits. There is no one gettung rich off of DCs. This legislation will not lead to cheaper homes. The trickle down effect is not real. Lire davantage