Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77082

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Preserving the heritage of our country and our communities is important. The changes proposed in this Act will limit the definition of heritage status so that many important sites will be significantly more challenging to protect. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77963

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There has been no consultation conducted with First Nations in the creation of the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022. The government has a duty to consult with First Nations and any work/proposals connected to the act must be halted until consultation has occurred with First Nations.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78542

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against Bill 23 in all its entirety. Ontario has enough land set aside for housing. This is a land grab for corporate buddies of Ford. They have bought land on 21% interest with the obvious intention of paying such a debt and profiting mightily from resale in development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78657

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 is a terrible, misguided, and money-hungry proposal. As a resident of Ontario and an urban planner, it is incredibly concerning to see a plan that proposes to encroach on established protective borders in the name of creating more housing opportunities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78865

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like the government to take note of the high level of public disapproval of nearly all aspects of Bill 23 and revoke it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Save the Green Belt… this land SHOULD NOT BE DEVELOPED for housing, it should be preserved for future generations to have a better quality of life through wetlands survival and species that thrive in wetlands-both animals and plants. Use old abandon building sites for home building. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79391

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We understand housing is scarce and are not naive to the fact that homeowners currently have a privileged prospective. These decisions, however, are clearly intended to further benefit a very small number of already wealthy entities, and lack any foresight. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79506

Commentaire fait au nom

Cavan Monaghan Future Watch

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 was passed with inadequate regard to important processes including public debate, scientific study and opportunity for public input. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79998

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I fail to see why this Bill 23, Schedule 6 has anything to do with building houses faster at a rate of 150,000 per year. Since the Heritage Act was invented how many designations have been granted? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80438

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brantford

Statut du commentaire

Please be advised that Brantford City Council at its meeting held November 29, 2022 adopted the following: A. THAT Report 2022-712 respecting Bill 23 the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 BE RECEIVED; and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80458

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal to legislative changes for the Ontario Heritage Act will NOT provide more affordable housing. Listen to the citizenry. People do not want the proposed changes to this Act, listen to the protests! Stop undermining democracy! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80466

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Cambridge

Statut du commentaire

See the attachment for comments from the City of Cambridge. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80476

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill will be disastrous for heritage in Ontario; indeed, it seems almost a punitive measure maliciously designed to destroy our provincial heritage. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80482

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live in a little village that is rich in heritage buildings that are designated as such. Tourists come here to experience the charm of our village including the heritage areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80492

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 6/ Bill 23...Heritage Designation - Leave the criteria for heritage designation at one point as is now. With two points, the Act discriminates against those properties representing residents who are not of European descent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80559

Commentaire fait au nom

St Catharines Downtown Association

Statut du commentaire

We stand with OBIAA and their comments below: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80576

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The changes to listing requirements proposed in Bill 23, forcing either designation or the dropping of thousands of properties from the register within two years, leaving them with no heritage status, will undermine decades of volunteer work identifying and honouring local properties of value to the Lire davantage