Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63340

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63344

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are many solutions to the housing crisis that don't involve destroying environmentally sensitive land. I am deeply disapointed by the government's decision to go back on previous promises and proceed with this plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63345

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am appalled at this proposal and entirely disagree with its premise. Ontario has more than enough land on which to create more housing. As noted in the recent article in the Narwhal by Emma McIntosh: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63346

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The government should focus on increasing density and supporting infrastructure in existing urban areas. This will lead to lower costs for residents and businesses, ultimately leading to a more competitive GTA.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63347

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt should not become developed land for housing. The answer to more housing should not be to sprawl into protected areas, but rather focusing on density and development in existing cities and towns. This is an egregious overstep of environmental protections

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63348

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt needs to stay Green! Ontario has plenty of land that can be developed without destroying natural habitat. We are a world class country and province that needs to act like one! Don’t make this short sighted decision based on development pressure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63351

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are no real justifiable reasons for destroying the green belt in order to open it up for private corporations to profit off of. There is more than enough land in the GTA if there was a focus placed on higher density housing developments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63356

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The protected lands should be left alone as they are. Why is this specific land targeted for housing? Housing and realestate can be done anywhere, these lands are in no way a requirement for any such projects. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63358

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Affordable housing does not come in the form of large, single-family dwellings built well outside areas providing easy access to public transit and a concentration of service amenities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63360

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a citizen of southwestern Ontario, the Greenbelt should be protected and remain undeveloped. I advise the government to listen to its own Housing Affordability Task Force. A quote from their report in February, 2022, in case the premier forgot, or failed to read it, is below. Lire davantage