Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63666

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with the development of housing near the green belt . There is plenty of land elsewhere to develope housing . We must protect our greenlands for future generations. Please consider somewhere else and protecting the environment .

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63668

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Good afternoon! I personally feel like removing any greenery would not be beneficial for the city and goes against the environmental policies that the government is currently supposed to be supporting. As much as the housing is an issue I believe that this is not a suitable solution to the problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63669

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Nobody wants this to happen. The greenbelt should be a protected space. Its very important for torontonians that these places should be protected rather than built on. Please protect this space from doug ford!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63670

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We do not need more sprawl and single family homes! We need to push for zoning changes to permit mixed use, dense, medium rise neighbourhoods. Single family homes in the greater golden horseshoe area will only provide further inventory for investors to speculate on or be swept up by the wealthy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63672

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is a terrible idea, the Green belt is protected for a reason. Without it, we are left with very little standing in between us and climate change. The new housing built will be pointless if it’s destroyed in a flood. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63673

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Ontario I strongly oppose this plan. The addition of 9400 acres includes land already protected within city boundaries, this is intentionally misleading the public. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63675

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a complete disgrace of democracy. The PC party agreed not to take land from the greenbelt and now are caving to developers who padded there election with money. This is a sell out to the people of Ontario and all honest taxpayers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63676

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt was established to ensure Ontario would always have land necessary to grow food. Some of the best land in the country. Rich soil. Once it is destroyed there is no reclaiming it. GONE. There are many smaller cities in Ontario that could support growth. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63677

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As the world works to reduce our impact on the environment and increase our resiliency in the face of climate change, this legislation is short-sighted and clearly has only one thing in mind: growth without consequence. Build up not out please, build smart not foolishly. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The purpose of the greenbelt is to PROTECT agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands from development. After decades of promising to leave the land intact, why are we going back to cut into it? The cuts to the greenbelt will likely result in a loss for our ecosystems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63682

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63686

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63689

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not allow for this. We have many other options for development without eating into our green belt and wetlands. Once made, this cannot be reversed. We have a responsibility to ourselves and future generations to preserve these areas at all costs.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63693

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal would be disastrous for Ontarians. The Greenbelt must be preserved - the land is not ideal for building housing developments, and those who live in these homes will most definitely experience floods, etc. as a result. Protect nature! Housing can be built elsewhere via rezoning.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63694

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is very bad. We don't need more greenfield suburban sprawl built on protected land. The status quo-- continuing to build endlessly expanding, low density, car-centric, cookie-cutter subdivisions-- is not a sustainable or desirable outcome. You want to address the housing shortage? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63696

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While housing is an important issue so is protecting the natural environment in Ontario. We need space for people to enjoy the outdoors. More construction means more carbon emissions into the environment and taking the Greenbelt away is taking trees away to combat these emissions. Lire davantage