Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64514

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The idea of building homes faster does not address the tens of thousands of private homes being bought by investment companies buying up said homes and forcing low to middle income families to rent at extremely high rates. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64515

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Unbelievable that the government wants to do this. Blatant disregard for the future of both this province and the planet. Flood plains, farmland, and untouched lands were designated as such for a reason. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64523

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Housing development should not come at the expense of green building standards or the protected Greenbelt. This response to the housing crisis is extremely short-sighted. Cheap housing and threatening Ontario's ecosystems will only introduce more issues in the future.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64525

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario’s Greenbelt protects farmland, communities, forests, wetlands and watersheds. It also preserves cultural heritage and supports recreation and tourism in Ontario’s Greater Golden Horseshoe. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64526

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt should be kept whole and undeveloped. We must have hard boundaries on our cities to prevent continued urban sprawl and encourage infill development. Protect our farmland and protect our wetlands.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64527

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I can't trust you at all to keep your word on saving our farms Build further north on less arable land and provide incentives for everyone to locate there It can be done And new highway traffic can be on non destroyed farmland Be creative with design ideas and development strategies Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64529

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is an important part of our province and should not be destroyed to increase developer profits. Densification in existing neighbourhoods can occur without harming this precious region. The housing crisis does not need to be addressed by destroying our environment.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64530

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not want our local ecosystem disrupted for more single family housing. Before we resort to shrinking the green belt, more effort to re-zone single family housing to medium density should be made. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64532

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt as it is currently mapped allows green space and environmental diversity in areas of high density or future high density neighbourhoods. Changing these designations is not going to allow the residents of these communities to have green space in their neighbourhoods. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64533

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

According to the Report of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force, land is not a restriction on the supply of houses. The stated goal of adding 1.5 million homes can be achieved without touching the greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The land was set aside for a reason. How are we going to feed more people if you keep paving over farmland. Density the land you have. Build family size units in condo towers instead of building out. No point in housing more people if we can't feed them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64535

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I staunchly oppose any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64536

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don’t approve of opening up the green belt. I wouldn’t consider myself a politically charged person, but this move would certainly motivate me to canvass for another political party

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64537

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Many of these areas where Green spaces will be removed in order to build housing are already overcrowded, and the infrastructure is not there to handle the extra traffic and pedestrians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64541

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The first thought to come to mind just form looking at the title of this proposal is that the Greenbelt is supposed to be protected natural landscape in a part of our province which is already quite developed; whether that be urban, suburban, or farmland/countryside. Lire davantage