Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63462

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The removal of this land is disgusting! Ford promised he wouldn’t do so and instead is going back on his word. To destroy land that we need to prevent flooding and protect wildlife. There is no need to remove this land in order to build more housing and to blame it on immigration is immoral. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63470

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Greenbelt is critical to our province. Suburban sprawl is already out of control; the last thing we need to do is destroy the few remaining green spaces.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63471

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It’s quite concerning to me, with in the midst of a climate crisis, but our elected officials are considering this damaging move. We already have houses/buildings in Ontario and elsewhere that sit empty with foreign investors and other owners. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63472

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with the proposed changes to the Greenbelt Plan. The proposed dossier available does not address the housing issues in Toronto and the GTA nor housing affordability. Instead, the proposal prioritizes a growing economy above sustainability in our province, yet again. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63478

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing: Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I am not entirely clear on the difference between ERO 019-6216 and ERO 019-6217, so I am also providing a comment here. Apologies for any duplication. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63489

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with this proposal. We cannot just continue to built on our green areas without consequence. We need more housing but the proposed solution is exactly the way of doing things that got us into the mess in the first place. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63519

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

200% disagrees with this idea. We can have better immigration plan to ask newcomers live in other cities instead of living Ontario . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63578

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please keep developers out of the Greenbelt. This is not the place to increase housing, especially at the risk of our environment and drinking water. Hands off!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63597

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In a world suffering from carbon emissions from human activity, is it not hypocritical to our carbon emissions target to remove part of the Greenbelt, a space that helps absorb carbon emissions? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63599

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These proposed amendments are disgusting and I will fight this with every fibre of my being. Why is it so easy for all of you to sell off every piece of space you consider unoccupied. I speak for the animals and the creatures you displace that cannot speak for themselves.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63616

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please let us conserve green spaces and build housing for people that will be affordable and accessible near public transit and where we have already destroyed our lands. Build up not out. The environment needs a home too and promises need to be kept

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63641

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose any develop on the Greenbelt! Please protect these lands and find somewhere else to build houses. This land is protected for a reason and I’m fearful of what will happen with any development. Please keep the Greenbelt off your plans for any future development.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63659

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is protected land and should never be touched - as promised by the Conservative premier in 2018. Infill within existing municipal boundaries and clean up existing brownfield sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63671

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Absolutely not. This will do nothing to help the housing crisis and once this land is built on we will not get it back. You are already paving over sensitive ecological areas for a highway no one wants, isn't that enough harm for one government? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63683

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Leave the Greenbelt alone. Build up, not out. The last thing we need in this province is more sprawl. Encourage human (not car) centred development. The climate crisis behooves us to move away from built environments that require significant expenditures of energy to do anything and everything. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63684

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I was born and raised near the Greenbelt. Throughout my whole life (20 years), I've watched the Greenbelt age gracefully and allow for nature to grow. The Greenbelt creates habitats for nearby wildlife and it's trails provide an escape from the business of life. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63688

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In May 2018, Premier Ford said: “Unequivocally, we won’t touch the Greenbelt […] people don’t want me touching the Greenbelt.” In June 2020, he said: “We’re not going to touch the Greenbelt, I will never touch the Greenbelt.” Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63712

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt is an environmental, cultural heritage, and urban planning success story. Back tracking on its protection while cities still have the capacity to provide more housing is short sighted at best. Do better

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63718

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt should be protected lands. It is designated that way for a reason, and moving the boundaries sets a dangerous precedent for future changes to it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I completely oppose this redesignation because it would not solve the affordable housing crisis – instead, it would undermine the whole point of the Greenbelt as permanent protection for important lands. Lire davantage