Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73593

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO 019-6216 / 019-6217 I fully support the removal of the Book Road West lands in Ancaster from the Greenbelt for several reasons already premised in the MMAH guidelines, but there is another underlying and compelling reason that is most important to me. It is as follows: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73662

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To the Government of Ontario, The Proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation (ERO number019-6217) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73669

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a terrible and misguided action. Affordable housing IS needed but where infrastructure already exists. The people don’t need more suburban single family monster homes under the guise of affordable housing which this will create. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73670

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not destroy any of the green belt for real estate land developers. Our summers are getting hotter and hotter due to climate change. Paving over the green belt will exacerbate this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73673

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation are irresponsible and short sighted, and also fail to address the problem which they propose to. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73677

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello. I am a Toronto resident who opposes the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area. While I understand that the government intends to add lands to the Greenbelt Area if the amendments pass, I reject this kind of simple replacement solution as irresponsible and narrow-minded. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73710

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have enough land to build on. Do not compromise the environmental integrity of the Green Belt. Land supply is not relevant to the housing crisis and it is incorrect to imply that development in the Green Belt will "fix" the issue. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73730

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why can't the government reassign the land being left abandoned by all the factories? There are several areas in GTA that can be repurposed for this. There is no need to use the Greenbelt for housing. If you start now, where will it stop?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73762

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly object to resdesignating greenbelt or wet lands for housing. It is a very short shighted view to increase urban sprawl. Building outwards from the centre of Ontario will make people more dependent on cars and thus fuel. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73775

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Really concern about using the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve in Pickering for housing (re: map #6): (1) There is a large nesting site of Great Blue Herons in the woodland trees within this parcel of land... Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73806

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely against this proposal. You are destroying our province. You have already killed our economy and education system and now people are dying in our hospitals while you try to kill our environment.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73844

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to removing land from the Greenbelt. While there is a housing crisis, I don't agree that this is the best solution and the blatant dirty politics of major Ford suplorters benefitting from this proposed change is an affront to the people as well as our environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73850

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

New homes and affordable homes are desperately needed. The green belt should not be touched to achieve this. The government appears to be favoring private developers and does not present a reasonable case as to why protected lands must be developed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not touch the Greenbelt, unless it is to add protected lands. The Greenbelt is an important ecological corridor that protects biodiversity and provides food and recreational opportunities in the province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74042

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have studied the maps of areas proposed to be removed from the Greenbelt. They seem to be consistent with the criteria that they be "suitable for development" ONLY providing that "suitability" is defined by the proponent for development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74073

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building more houses does not solve the housing crisis when the majority of people can't afford to buy a home. This move is clearly motivated by selfish greed and profit. The government needs to remember their job is to serve the public not developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74075

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I thought the Greenbelt was protected? It isn't, and I say it needs to be. Ontario created the Greenbelt in 2005 to protect agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands in the Greater Golden Horseshoe area from development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74079

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO019-6217 should NOT be considered. Premier Ford has stated on many occasions that the Green Belt lands would not be touched because "the people have spoken". Taking ANY land from the Green Belt therefore means - 1.He's NOT TO BE TRUSTED to keep his word Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74187

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to any changes or amendments or boundary reduction or boundary modification to the current Greenbelt, designated farmland, designated significant and protected wetlands and forests. All of these natural ecosystems must remain protected and uncompromised by development.