Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98768

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Farmland that is owned for a period of time, lets say 10-20 years, should be allowed to sever one parcel for family as it used to be 20 years ago. Focusing only on allowing more houses on farmland, still doesn't take down barriers of affordability and equity for the family members.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98774

Commentaire fait au nom

Grand River Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

The Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) recommends the following feedback be provided on the ERO posting: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98777

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Township of Southgate

Statut du commentaire

Please be advised that at their April 30, 2024, Council meeting, the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Southgate approved the following: No. 2024-211 Moved By Councillor Singh Soares Seconded By Deputy mayor Dobreen Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98781

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please find my letter and comments supporting the Proposed Planning Statement, 2024 attached. Regards, Derek Good Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98795

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would first like to congratulate Mr. Doug Ford and his government for being forward thinking and having the courage and ability to do what is needed to make Ontario grow and deliver affordable housing to our communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98810

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Good Day, The proposed changes to the PPS and (unlike its name) Bill 185 are unlikely to result in more housing being built. It is likely to result in far less housing while the devastating environmental impacts and other negative consequences could be felt for generations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98818

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This PPS threatens farmland and water resources with unnecessary expansion into rural areas. Your own report found that there is already enough land to build housing and, thus, infringing on rural areas is unnecessary. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98820

Commentaire fait au nom

Corporation of the County of Elgin

Statut du commentaire

Re: Proposed Provincial Policy Statement 2024, Submission from the County of Elgin Dear Minister Calandra, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98826

Commentaire fait au nom

Middlesex County

Statut du commentaire

Dear Minister, I am writing on behalf of the Council of the County of Middlesex to provide our thoughts on the Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act and the proposed 2024 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS), from the perspective of our rural and small urban communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98828

Commentaire fait au nom

City of London, Planning and Development

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the draft Provincial Planning Statement. The attached letter includes comments prepared by City of London Planning and Development staff. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98831

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

GOOD DAY We are here to say Stop Bill 185, yet another bill to halt Public Participation. This Bill will threaten public participation, self-determination, reconciliation, and environmental protections. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98833

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Planning Authority should be retained by the Region of Waterloo, our Countryside Line remain intact, and forced boundary expansions eliminated. If Planning Authority is removed Greenbelt expansion is required to adequately protect the Waterloo Moraine. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98834

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello Premier Doug Ford, I support Bill 185 and I hope it will correct many years of wrong doing with respect to decisions that were made in the past about Garner Road in Ancaster. Background; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98837

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi there as the son of a multi generation land owner the cost of land and the desire to keep the land in our family severance of a least one lot for transitional living for my parents as well as an asset divided for my siblings this is one of the only options for us to carry on multi generational la Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

98845

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

- Concerning changes to remove or make greenfield density targets optional need to removed and existing greenfield density targets maintained or increased for all parts of Ontario, Lire davantage