Commentaire
I am in opposition of this proposal for many reasons. It has become apparent that the use of cars is highly encouraged within Ontario cities, leaving many folks who do not drive or cannot drive, at a disadvantage. Despite the city of Toronto being one of Ontario's most 'walkable cities', there is very little consideration for those who wish to travel by any other means of transportation other than a car. The use of bike lanes is an inherent part of our transportation systems, and once they are removed, citizens' options are reduced. I also understand there are arguments that the bike lanes are rarely used. This is not an accurate observation as it must be considered how developed the bike lanes are (line painting on the road vs. bike lane dividers) and the area in which the bike lanes are installed. In spaces within suburban towns, there will be less use of bike lanes as it may be difficult for people to access them. Instead of removing the bike lanes, it would be best to develop systems that make it easier for bike users to access the bike lanes from their homes (is there sufficient public transportation they can ride bikes to?). It is also no wonder everyone depends on their car to travel. I myself have attempted to travel by public transportation and walking and have found it incredibly dangerous (due to the cars) and difficult as there is no space for anything other than a car.
Of course my position comes from someone who resides within Toronto. However, I had originally lived in the KW area and moved due to needing a car to travel within the city. The quality of my life has greatly improved since I can now move around the city without a car. If bike lanes are removed, that is robbing myself and others one of the few options we have.
Soumis le 8 novembre 2024 3:01 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
114272
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire