Bill 17’s proposal to ban…

Bill 17’s proposal to ban cities from requiring sun/shadow, wind, urban design, or lighting studies is deeply misguided. These are basic considerations for livability, safety, and good planning—especially in dense urban contexts.

Sun and wind studies matter for comfort and safety in public spaces. Urban design review helps ensure new buildings fit into the neighbourhood and support walkability. Lighting impacts everything from public safety to ecological health. These aren’t frivolous asks—they’re part of responsible, future-proof development.

If the goal is to streamline, a better approach would be to limit when certain studies are required (e.g. only for tall buildings or large sites), not to ban them outright.

As for what should be required: anything related to climate resilience, public health, infrastructure capacity, and accessibility should remain on the table. These aren’t red tape—they’re due diligence.

And yes, accepting studies signed by licensed professionals makes sense—but only if municipalities retain the ability to review them for quality and context. A rubber stamp isn’t good enough.

Please don’t tie cities’ hands on planning. Let’s build quickly, but wisely.