Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

141835

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Are you sure prefab buildings will be sturdy enough, safe enough, long lasting or require premature replacement wasting future time, labour and materials by not being tornado proof, quake proof, flood proof, hurricane proof ,f& fire proof ? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142556

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As someone who works in urban design , you NEED TO keep the regulations around doing lighting , wind , UD and other environmental studies for an application. Those studies help ensure the city is livable and enjoyable for citizens

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142572

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposed regulation is extremely short sighted and problematic. Not requiring wind or shadow studies at zoning would invalidate any opportunity to mitigate the effects of shadow and wind which will affect enjoyment of parks and public spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142603

Commentaire fait au nom

Gradient Wind Engineering Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a practicing Wind Engineer in the Province of Ontario, I feel responsible for commenting on what would be lost if Pedestrian Level Wind Studies (PLWS) were to not be required for certain (e.g. tall building) development proposals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142852

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Ah yes, take away vital tools which help us build better site plans like *checks notes* sun and wind studies. I'm sure this will end so well for new builds when we end up creating massive wind tunnels because who can be bothered to do one of those pesky wind studies. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144009

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a young Ontarian concerned about our province’s climate future, I am strongly opposed to these proposed regulations. They would significantly undermine local efforts to promote environmentally responsible development and reduce long-term costs for Ontarians. Key Concerns: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144165

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
How do you envision a city without urban design? Are you imagining a place that simply provides housing without considering what makes it livable for people? Ignoring the urban design component, which plays a crucial role in shaping cities, is deeply problematic. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
How come you came up with the idea of eliminating urban design, shadow study and...? How come you thought removing these make the process faster? Did you even think about the impacts of not having urban design oversight for new developments? Lire davantage