Commentaire
At a time when the economy is strained and everyday people are stretched thin and maybe not paying attention, Premier Ford is moving ahead with major changes to how water and wastewater services are delivered. This deserves everyone's attention.
Key Reasons Behind Why I Oppose the Proposed Transfer of Water and wastewater to a corporation:
1. It sets a dangerous precedent
What begins in Peel will not stay there. If this goes through, the same model can be expanded across Ontario.
2. Corporatization means higher costs
Water rates will rise just as they did with Hydro One. After privatization, the Ford government now spends billions annually subsidizing skyrocketing hydro bills-money that should support health care and education. Public utilities operate on cost recovery models; corporations-even publicly owned ones-operate to generate revenue and financial return.
3. Reduced oversight and greater risk to water safety
Corporatization weakens transparency and public accountability. Ontario learned after Walkerton that strong municipal oversight is essential to protect water quality and public health.
4. Developer influence and lack of transparency
The government claims this is to "build more homes faster" but the rationale is unclear and raises red flags about developer influence. The Greenbelt scandal showed how easily public policy can be shaped by private interests.
Ontarians deserve water services that stay public, affordable, transparent, and free from private or political influence. Transferring control to a corporate structure threatens public trust, affordability, and environmental protection for future generations.
Soumis le 17 novembre 2025 4:40 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi de 2001 sur les municipalités pour transférer la compétence en matière d’eau et d’eaux usées aux municipalités de palier inférieur de la région de Peel et adopter une loi autonome pour autoriser la constitution de sociétés
Numéro du REO
025-1098
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
171999
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire