The proposed amendments to…

The proposed amendments to the Highway Traffic Act are counterproductive to the stated goals of reducing gridlock, enhancing community safety, and supporting economic vitality. A large body of empirical research from North America and Europe demonstrates that reallocating road space from private vehicles to dedicated cycling and transit infrastructure consistently increases overall network efficiency. When car lanes are reduced and replaced with high-throughput modes, total person-throughput rises because buses, streetcars, and bicycles move far more people per metre of road space than single-occupancy vehicles. Cities such as New York, Montreal, Vancouver, Paris, and London have repeatedly recorded faster travel times and greater reliability for all modes following such reallocations, even on corridors where vehicle lanes were removed.

Restricting municipalities from adjusting lane configurations undermines local transportation planning and prevents evidence-based design. Streets that prioritize people—through protected bike lanes, transit-priority corridors, wider sidewalks, and safer crossings—yield measurable benefits: fewer collisions, healthier communities, and improved access to local businesses. These environments encourage families to spend more time in their neighbourhoods, increase foot traffic, and stimulate recreational and retail activity that supports economic growth.

Common misconceptions suggest that bike lanes increase congestion, harm businesses, or eliminate access for drivers. These claims are contradicted by observed outcomes. Congestion is primarily driven by induced demand from excess car capacity, not by the presence of bike or transit lanes. Retail sales typically rise after protected cycling and pedestrian improvements because customers arrive more frequently and stay longer. Deliveries, emergency vehicles, and essential access continue to function effectively when municipalities design complete streets with appropriate curb-management strategies.

The proposed prohibition removes municipalities’ ability to implement proven solutions that reduce traffic, improve safety, and strengthen local economies. Allowing cities to use all available tools—including lane reallocation—is essential for creating efficient, resilient, and vibrant communities.