Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31868

Commentaire fait au nom

The Regional Municipality of York

Statut du commentaire

Please refer to the attached document for York Region's staff response on this posting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31871

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am the President of the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (SLNA). I am writing to express our profound disagreement with Bill 108, which, if passed, will have wide ranging and detrimental impacts on our neighbourhood. Bill 108 proposes changes to 15 separate Acts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31876

Commentaire fait au nom

Annex Residents' Association

Statut du commentaire

Attached please find the “Joint Response of Eight Toronto Residents’ Associations to Provincial Bill 108 and to Proposed Changes to the Planning Act, the Development Charges Act, and the Ontario Heritage Act” submitted by Annex Residents’ Association, Garment District Residents’ Association, Grange Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31887

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This schedule is basically a transfer payment from municipalities and their taxpayers to developers. Guelph has seen no issues with demand from developers with these fees in place. The only effect these charges will have is to increase the profits of developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31894

Commentaire fait au nom

Municipality of Port Hope

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of Municipality of Port Hope (MPH) and at the direction of Council, I am submitting preliminary comments to the Proposed Bill 108 (More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019) and the Proposed Housing Supply Action Plan, which is currently at first reading in the legislative process. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31897

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no benefit to reducing fees for developers. It will be proposed by developers that they can introduce more product to the market at a lower price, but instead they will increase profits and shirk their responsibility as community builders. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31903

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Responding to Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice: Ontario's Housing Action Plan, Amendments to the Development Charges Act May 30, 2019 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31905

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Tay Valley Township uses Development Cost charges to pay for the additional equipment (fire trucks, snow plows), infrastructure (roads, parks), and services that are required when growth occurs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31912

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with the undemocratic proposal to limit Development Charges for the City of Toronto. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31916

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I fully support the submission made by Ontario Greenbelt Alliance on Bill 108 - Schedule 3 - the proposed More Homes, More Choice Act: Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31944

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I reject Bill 108. This is a considerable step backwards with so many inclusions of so many amendments to Ontario's Endangered Species Act in Bill 108. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31948

Commentaire fait au nom

Parks and Recreation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Parks and Recreation Ontario supports the government’s plan to make housing more attainable for Ontarians through increased housing options, while still protecting the province’s cultural heritage assets and environmentally sensitive areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31957

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The South Armour Heights Residents' Association (SAHRA) of Toronto supports the requests of the City of Toronto, the Large Urban Mayors' Caucus of Ontario, the Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations, the Confederation of Ratepayers and Residents Associations, the Federation of Urban Nei Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31967

Commentaire fait au nom

The City of Kingston

Statut du commentaire

The City of Kingston supports the provincial objectives in trying to create more housing and a greater mix of housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31973

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need development charges to pay for rec centres, parking, libraries, etc. I bet everyone on Ontario uses at least one of these! I am going to end of paying for these through higher property taxes. At least give cities time to plan for this change to avoid delaying projects already in the works.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31981

Commentaire fait au nom

West Neighbourhood House

Statut du commentaire

I am writing as a staff member representing West Neighbourhood House, a United Way agency serving over 14,000 less-advantaged individuals a year, helping them to gain greater control over their lives and within their communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31989

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is legislation that should not be passed. First and foremost we have regulations to protect our sensitive lands from development. The resulting effects following the introduction of this bill will decimate the value on due process and regulations from developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31998

Commentaire fait au nom

CERA - Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation

Statut du commentaire

Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation 427- 192 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5T 2C2 Re: Bill 108 – More Homes, More Choice Act About CERA Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

32002

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Committee Report To: Warden Mitch Twolan Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Kara Van Myall Director of Planning and Development Date: June 20, 2019 Re: Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Proposed Changes Appended Recommendation: Lire davantage