Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47834

Commentaire fait au nom

The Regional Municipality of Peel

Statut du commentaire

The Region of Peel (Region) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed policy update to modernize Ontario’s environmental approvals process for low-risk municipal sewage works by implementing the consolidated linear infrastructure permissions approach. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47857

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Oakville, Development & Environmental Engineering

Statut du commentaire

Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Comments are included in the WORD files as requested. Some Questions/Comments: 1) Can a municipality opt out of the ECA process. If they do, how are things approved? Must they still implement a monitoring program, etc.? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47860

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We support the move toward the Consolidated Linear ECAs, and the mirroring of the water Approvals. However, for the following reasons, we ask for your consideration in pushing the rollout from the Spring of 2021 to at least the Fall of 2021, or ideally, the Spring of 2022: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47861

Commentaire fait au nom

City of London

Statut du commentaire

1. General Comments Through the proposed changes, the Transfer of Review program will be phased out by the Consolidated Linear Infrastructure program. Please note the following comments: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47871

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Waterloo

Statut du commentaire

General: We are generally supportive of the proposed consolidation of the ECA processes, subject to further clarification of some items and suggested modifications, as noted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47878

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Richmond Hill

Statut du commentaire

Overall, the City of Richmond Hill is in favour of the changes that are being proposed within the Consolidated Linear ECA for Stormwater initiative. We believe that stormwater should be brought to the same management level as water and wastewater systems are at today. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47881

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed changes to environmental approvals for municipal sewage collection works ERO number: 019-1080 Notice type: Policy Act: Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990 Posted by: Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Notice stage: Proposal Proposal posted: July 8, 2020 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47896

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Town of LaSalle and Town of Kingsville located in the Windsor-Essex Region of Southwestern Ontario, the following comments have been developed upon review of the "Proposed Changes to Environmental Approvals: Linear Infrastructure Approach – ECA Changes for Stormwater Management and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47916

Commentaire fait au nom

City of St. Catharines

Statut du commentaire

To Whom it may Concern; Staff at the City of St. Catharines have reviewed the draft ECA’s for the consolidated storm and sanitary sewer systems along with the draft design guidelines that were provided on the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) posting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47937

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

General comments: - I support the practical and direct approach being taken by the MECP in regards to both documents and the overall initiative. - A streamlined approach such as this is much needed - The elevation of the design criteria is also much needed and greatly supported. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47945

Commentaire fait au nom

B.M. Ross and Associates Limited

Statut du commentaire

A. General Comments There are several grammatical and spelling errors scattered throughout the Draft Design Criteria and the two draft ECA's. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47946

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

Please find consolidated comments on the Design Criteria, Sanitary ECA and Stormwater ECA drafts from the City of Hamilton. Please find three files attached below. As requested, our comments have been added using the MS Word Comments feature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47947

Commentaire fait au nom

Norton Engineering Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Section 1.2.3. insert, "consideration for lifecycle costs, future inspection, etc. Installing cheap stuff means reduced lifespan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47950

Commentaire fait au nom

Norton Engineering

Statut du commentaire

2.10.12 Rewrite last sentence.. (for grammar) 2.12.13 Sanitary laterals and sanitary building sewers shall be specified with a minimum slope of 2%. Most municipalities require that now. Let's not leave wiggle room. 2.12.15 add, "...to facilitate acceptance, inspection and... Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47951

Commentaire fait au nom

Norton Engineering

Statut du commentaire

Appendix A 2.3.2. we can only leak test new sewer installs, not rehabs or replacements. This section looks like it was written for rehab jobs. In both 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 (there shouldn't be active laterals yet, and laterals will be capped at this point, so no plug required). Lire davantage