Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63542

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How do we allow someone who says the Greenbelt will not be touched to then go behind the public in secrecy and tell developers he will open it up for him. We have a plethora of options to fix this housing crisis and it most certainly doesn't require tearing up the green belt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63546

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is payback to fords developer donor taskmasters. Vile on every level. Myopic in its approach to housing. Shameful to even his own voters. No one thinks this is a good idea but fords wet-chinned corporate overlords. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63547

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The richness of southern Ontario is its ability to provide for our population: food, air and water. The Greenbelt provides these by protecting land for agriculture, natural growth and marshlands which filter water for us all. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63548

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The short-sightedness of parceling out the green belt farmlands and wetlands is bad enough. There us no coherent principle or plan behind it. However the blatant rewards for land speculators are what really seems corrupt, given the generous political donations they’ve made that are publicly known. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63550

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The fact this is being considered is truly shameful. Considering how much damage has already been done to the environment, it should be obvious that what we have left is very important. This is ignoring the fact that it was PROMISED that this land would remain untouched. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63552

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Leave the greenbelt spaces alone. The zones should not be moved, only expanded. Have a modicum of care for the fact that we are not the last generation, and we can never get green spaces back.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63553

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is a complete farce at best and actively dangerous at worst. The Greenbelt is irreplaceable - opening it up for development would cause irreparable harm to Ontario's development goals, natural environment, watershed, and quality of life. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63556

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about restructuring the Green Belt, even if more land is proposed to be added to it later. I would much rather that the proposed additions to the Green Belt go through without any subtraction. Then find a different way to build more homes without affecting the Green Belt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63557

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In no uncertain terms: DO NOT PAVE THE GREENBELT. The Ford government previously promised not to touch the Greenbelt, and was clearly given a mandate partially based on that promise. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63559

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No evidence has been provided by the Ontario government that expanding into the Greenbelt is necessarily to solve the housing crisis. The February 2022 report published by the govenrment of Ontario's own Housing Affordability Task Force shows that lack of land is not the problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I fail to see how building another car-dependent, cookie-cutter subdivision will solve any problems apart from enriching developers and socializing the cost of making them somewhat liveable

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63561

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt should remain protected land. There are other healthier, environmentally friendly options for housing that do not require new land. This is a short sighted solution and needs to be stopped. New sprawl is unhealthy for all communities. Environment needs to be a priority. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not touch the greenbelt!!! It is home to countless animals, farms that provide food for our citizens and watersheds that clean our waterways and absorb carbon. Your short sightiness will literally create immense hardships for us

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63563

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is appalling that Premier Ford snuck in legislation to develop the Greenbelt last Friday during the CUPE strike announcement. Doug Ford has again lied to the people of Ontario, as he stated in 2018 that a Tory government would maintain the Greenbelt in its entirety. Lire davantage