Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65921

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Absolutely disgusting that this is even being proposed. These lands are protected for a reason. It isn’t as simple as just “adding more land somewhere else” as Doug Ford wants to say. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65922

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a tax paying citizen of Ontario I simply refuse to see the greenbelt protection removed. I do not accept the removal of rights of the Conservation authority. I do not approve of or consent to the development of a new highway in the greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65923

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please consider utilizing existing infrastructure to expand housing options for low and middle income earners and support employment in these areas as well. Please consider that this space was deemed protected from these types of proposals specifically. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65924

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is an absolutely terrible idea for all of Ontario and will only benefit Doug Fords friends. It’s time the government looked at purchasing existing empty building and repurposing them for rent controlled housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65925

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This must be stopped. Doug is a puppet for all the developer friends who want to make money and have no care for our land or the negative impace this development would have. How dare you. This is NOT what is needed right now!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65926

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We need to protect our green spaces, and this will be going against what the greenbelt is a necessity for. Find a more suitable location to build houses, that will not impact our conversation areas and protected wildlife. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65929

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The green belt is a home to many species of animals. We do not need more mansions. Please consider using all the empty office buildings for affordable housing ! Please remember money cannot buy air. We need the green belt for the sake of air quality as well. Human greed must have boundaries. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65932

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support the use of Green Belt lands for the sake of housing development as outlined in this proposal. There are surely other options available to the current government to re-zone already developed lands or convert existing buildings/structures for multi-use or residential housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65934

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is ridiculous and something Ontarians do not believe in. Our green belt contains a variety of irreplaceable nature, animals, and other wildlife that would be all but wiped out with this plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65940

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hi there. You said you wouldn’t touch this land! What you’re doing isn’t necessary. Use land we are already using and buildings we already have. Do the right thing Doug. The more we destroy our plant, the less time we’ll have here.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65942

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It's important for you to see that your promises matter, so I am commenting here. You know perfectly well that you already promised to not do this and you're obviously using current events as a distraction to slip this by. That's what crooked, corrupt politicians do. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65944

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is absolutely abhorrent. We can’t let our protected land be destroyed, animals displaced and habitats wiped out just so our premier’s friends can put more money in their pockets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65946

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is unspeakable. This land is protected land that we the people do not want turned into more unaffordable homes. The housing crisis won’t be fixed by building more expensive housing. This is a scheme to make profits for government investors along the new highway (also something no one wants). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

65950

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Instead of destroying the greenbelt, the province can address the significant number of properties that are currently vacant - empty office spaces downtown Toronto can be repurposed and turned into low income housing. We can also address the 1.3 million Canadian homes that are sitting empty. Lire davantage