Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68311

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We have lived within the greenbelt since I was a child. We have watched development sprawl. Sometimes to the benefit of our communities, sometimes with serious consequences (and driven only with the interest of $$$) . We have watched the populations of song birds change and dwindle. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68314

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
building more houses will help the housing crisis. Implementing more AFFORDABLE housing will help. You can build all the $800,000+ houses you want but it will not stop this crisis. More housing without affordability doesn't make sense. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68320

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Seriously… keep your money hungry hands off our greenbelt. This is a very slippery slope and soon we will not have a Greenbelt at all. The land in the Greenbelt is protected for a reason and the wildlife that lives there depends on it - our ecosystems depend on it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68321

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please do not develop any sections of the green belt in the way proposed. The climate change crisis is real. Former governments created the green belt as a way to protect fragile ecosystems which protect us all. This isn’t your land to develop. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68324

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please protect our green belt, we have hundreds of acres of land that can be redeveloped for housing, but if we destroy this green belt land it can never be recovered. I beg of you, do not move forward with this proposal.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68327

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The reduction of protections for our Greenbelt is a mistake which will impact many generations to come. This should not be allowed. Please consider our childrens’ futures above short sighted development plans which are poised to benefit only the already wealthy.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68328

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Removing designated lands is unacceptable - particularly given the density that they are adjacent to. We don’t need more sprawl in Ontario. We need more vertical. We’ve already scene a decrease in wildlife and air quality, critical habitat is important. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68329

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
One issue is that these plots will simply get sold to the ultra wealthy who will develop the land as they please. Most people who are not part of that exclusive circle will struggle with that and fewer people will get to enjoy that land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68331

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hi, why is this even being considered, we need this land for food not more housing, we will not be able to support the growing population by doing this. This is concerning to me, we should focus on high density areas and better transit, not ruining something so sacred as our food supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68335

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We are extremely disappointed this government is walking back its election promise to not touch the green belt. The green belt is necessary for protecting our food and water as well as protecting our homes from flooding. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68336

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do not allow Doug Ford to destroy the greenbelt. This was, and always should remain, protected lands. No development should be allowed. It will cause environmental issues for decades. It is our duty to protect these lands for the sake of our children’s future. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68340

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is getting out of hand! You need to know when to stop your greedy behaviors! My vote will no longer be with the conservatives. You have proven how selfish you are and how corrupt and money hungery you are. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68342

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am against re-classifying any of the Greenbelt for housing or other development. It would cost Ontario tax payers less, and preserve their natural heritage, to use land already inside urban areas that is already zoned for residential development. There is sufficient of such land available. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68344

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please keep our Greenbelt protected. Wetlands are some of the most biodiverse ecosystems on the plantet and their loss would be devastating. Highways and developments are not what our province needs right now. Lire davantage