Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74480

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am horrified by the blatant corruption of this government. The plan outlined in Bill 23 will not provide housing while simultaneously destroying lands and habitats vital for the well-being of Ontarians and Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74483

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I would like the Greenbelt to remain protected. Let's build homes with high density and nearby public transit within cities where available, instead of building more sprawl that nobody asked for. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74484

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is greatly concerning that this legislation was put into place that has a clear connection to PC party donors. The corruption associated with this legislation will forever stain Ontario, and will put municipalities at financial risk, and Ontarians at risk of further homelessness. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74485

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Not only are our green lands important and should be protected, but spreading housing across more land will only hurt the walkability of already car dependant suburbs. We should be building upwards, not outwards, and focusing on good urban planning over the development of precious natural land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74487

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Build affordable mid density housing on or close to existing public transit nodes. Keep farmland available for feeding expected increase in population. With climate and water issues in California we must protect and support our own local food supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74491

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
(1) You are enriching developers on the backs of current homeowners. Passing development costs along by forcing municipalities to raise property taxes is wrong. Your government has declared war on homeowners and this is a fight that your government will not win. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74494

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Why are comment open until December 4th but the bill was passed November 24th? This bill does not serve the people! Developer fees are in place to pay for the infrastructure required for further developments. Why are tax payers paying this fee while developers make all the money?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74498

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Urban sprawl is not the solution to the housing crisis. Encourage and promote development to other areas where there is: A) cheaper land B) a housing crisis C) an employment crisis (not enough employees to fill vacancies) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74502

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
A range of concerns arise from the government's decision to develop the Greenbelt for housing: Firstly, debate in the provincial leslgislature has been cut short on the bill, an afront to democracy. There are legitimate questions around backroom dealings with developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74503

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I think you know EXACTLY how most of us feel about you developing the Green Belt. We made it very clear while you were running for office. You said "the people have spoken, we have listened, we will not touch the Green Belt". Remember that? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74504

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I'm greatly disappointed in Ontario's plan to bulldoze through our Greenbelt to benefit developers at the cost of our environment and planet. Urban sprawl is not the answer to our housing crisis and we need to modernize our existing city boundaries with higher density housing and improved transit.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74508

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I’m not sure why this government has chosen to build in the greenbelt. It is totally unnecessary. If you want to build more houses which I totally support, you should upzone the yellowbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74509

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Although I doubt this comment will change anything, as the government has already made its mind up, but I am a Conservative voter who absolutely condemns Bill C23 and the removal of Greenbelt land. How is it protected land if you are just going to reassign it? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74512

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I disagree with the decision to remove any land from the Greenbelt. As the government's own housing task force states, there is sufficient land in the Golden Horseshoe already. No need to touch the Greenbelt. The Greenbelt was supposed to be permanently protected. Lire davantage