Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75272

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt should not be touched. As the GTA grows we have less and less areas for forests which provides habitats to wildlife and provides clean air. The GTA generally has a good air quality measure. Getting rid of this green belt area could sacrifice our air. Also, where will the wildlife go? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75274

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Make no mistake. This is taking parts of protected land away "in the name of" more housing. Long term, this will be horrible for the greenbelt and will only increase everyone taxes. This is not fixing any of the issues we have right now. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75276

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a terrible decision, this legislation taking aim at conservation areas and the greenbelt specifically is a disaster and also highly questionable as to whether it is designed to help the actual problem vs make certain developers richer. Protect our natural resources, end this madness.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75277

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is an unnecessary action that does not pass the smell test. Ontario municipalities have recently freed up 14000 hectares of urban land for development, as reported by CBC News on Nov 13, 2022. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75278

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am deeply concerned regarding the proposed changes to the Greenbelt. These changes will not improve housing affordability, and come with huge environmental and agricultural costs for Ontarians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75280

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is an absolutely terrible idea, and I am deeply disturbed you're considering it. Destroying protected areas in the name of development should be illegal, I can't believe governments are allowed to just remove these kinds of designations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75283

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
My family dies not agree with the purposed changes to Greenbelt. We think the government should not be allowed to make these amendments without the publics consent ( should be a referendum?). We did not vote for this change and we think it will affect all Ontarian residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75286

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This plan to use greenbelt land for development is short-sighted and frankly a dangerous decision the provincial government has made to give up parcels of *PROTECTED* greenbelt land (did you know that Ontario is home to some of the *most fertile farmland in the world*?) --- to developers who want to Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75287

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Once nature has been destroyed it can never return to the way it was. Backyard trees and gardens don't support frogs, deer, beaver. We need wetlands for oxygen, and contiguous greenbelt to allow animals to roam. This is a serious political mistake, trying to destroy the greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75288

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe the Greenbelt should not be touched because it will not benefit the population. There is plenty of land to build housing on, that is not being efficiently used. Moreover, the land was protected for a reason: to improve the health of our communities and environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75294

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Development within the greenbelt is a poor idea and will only lead to further environmental damage which this government should be fighting to protect. Your lack of progress in this area strengthens my distrust in your leadership. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75296

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I greatly opposed Doug Ford's attempt to make inroads on the Greenbelt. Ford has demonstrated time and time again that he does not care about the future of this province as a whole, as this environmentally protected area is an investment in all our futures. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75297

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt should remain untouched. By developing it, adding more concrete, the hotter the area becomes with no greenery to help regulate the climate. The animals are displaced and people begin to complain about them as pests in their neighbourhoods. Coyotes are already roaming streets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75298

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is WRONG WRONG WRONG to build on a greenbelt area, it is WRONG WRONG WRONG to destroy a greenbelt area and it should NEVER be done.....EVER. Stop letting the almighty dollar be the root cause of this injustice! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75299

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I wholeheartedly disagree with this amendment. The purpose of the Greenbelt is to protect important habitat and viable agricultural land which is threatened by sprawl development. The Greenbelt provides innumerable benefits to the province and its residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75303

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Developing the Greenbelt is not an acceptable course of action to meet housing demands. The Greenbelt is needed to support feeding the influx of people as well as to mitigate the potential risks to the GTA and surrounding communities associated with climate change. Lire davantage