Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75166

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Have we looked at other ideas like taxing second homes/income properties? The green belt is an important part of the region and provides refuge for wildlife. It seems like no one cares and this is all about making money for friends by selling land and building houses. Let’s think this through.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75168

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This incursion into the greenbelt is awful. We need to protect the source of our water. Instead, this is a (quite possibly illegal) graft to turn protected lands into a handout to Doug Ford's cronies. We cannot afford for this to happen. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75172

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hamilton asked and voted on infilling to create more housing while protecting our Greenspace. Anything else is a dictatorship and highly suspect. More individual condos and single family homes are not conducive to areas where rent and the cost of living is so inflated. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75173

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I can’t believe I voted PC. This is the most underhanded and unprecedented betrayal of your voters confidence in your promises that have ever been made. I will never vote PC again, not municipally, not provincially and not federally. Thanks for nothing Doug.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75179

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
These 50000 homes will not do anything for helping the housing shortage. We need entry level homes not multi million dollar homes that only benefit the builders. The same builders who were told they would be opening the Greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75182

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Doug Ford specifically promised not to touch the greenbelt. Now he's letting developers use the land? And they just happen to be PC party contributors? Not a coincidence, let's be honest. Honesty is hardly one of Doug's strong points.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75184

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am deeply disappointed that the government is considering removing valuable farm land from green belt protection. We saw in the early days of Covid how countries, including our large neighbour to the south, became protectionist. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75185

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please use scientific assessments to base decisions regarding sensitive Greenbelt lands. The housing and development crisis will not be solved by building more urban sprawl. In fact that will only worsen the problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75193

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please do not remove lands from the Greenbelt. There does not seem to be appropriate consultation. Adding more land to support Ecological systems makes sense. Protect our farmland, protect out wetlands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75194

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I 100% disagree with the amendments. As a constituent and a voter, I do not want to see these changes go into effect. These amendments are short-sighted and serve to benefit only a small few while ruining precious ecological lands that cannot be replaced. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75198

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
My concern relates to the long term consequences of buildings on land that has potential for flooding and/or contributes to future flooding. Flooding is recognized by international organizations that flooding is the biggest emerging threat to people and property from climate disasters. Lire davantage