Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105708

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this proposed bill whatsoever. Bike lanes are an essential part of our community and achieving our climate change goals. The province has enough on their plate and does not need to get involved in local traffic issues that are a municipal matter, not provincial. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105711

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Time and time again you can see that bike lanes HELP traffic. Yet this bill would tear them up, wasting tax dollars just to ensure that traffic gets WORSE.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105712

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The provincial government SHOULD NOT be involved in municipal decisions regarding bike lanes. Road infrastructure in Toronto is completely different than road infrastructure say, in Woodstock. We need more access to safe bike infrastructure, and cater less to vehicles. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support the exemption from the Environmental Assessment Act for or related to Highway 413. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105714

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Extremely disappointed by this lack of concern for public safety in the name of private profit for you know whose buddies.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105715

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is terrible legislation. Removing existing bike lines is a waste of money. It is also an overreach of provincial power. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105716

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is utter garbage! It's ableist and discriminatory. How is it ok to only cater to the those who drive? How is it ok to actively discriminate and further disadvantage multiple demographics by further impeding their ability to get around the city? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105718

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bloor is the backbone of downtown Toronto's transportation network. It should accomodate all transportation modes (cars, public transit AND bikes). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105719

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The removal of environmental protections goes against everything Ontario stands for. This is not the way to reduce gridlock. Also, the province needs more bike lanes and transit! Not more cars, pollution energy costs.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105720

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Fully unsupportive of this. There is complete lack of rationale to remove existing bike lanes along with installation of future ones. Municipalities have publicly endorsed master transportation plans and the province is overstepping its reach. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105722

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my deep concern and opposition to Section XII of the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is a bad idea for several reasons. First, it seems like an over-reach of the provincial government into municipal jurisdiction, and one that would set a bad precedent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105724

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am supportive of some items in this Bill. Particularly, requiring provincial approval for bicycle lanes that remove a roadway lane promotes driving over active transportation, causing more gridlock. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105725

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To reduce traffic, we should redirect funds toward decreasing car traffic - I.e. improving public transit infrastructure and bike lanes. Not the other way around!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105726

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m a taxpayer who deserves the opportunity to use the road safely. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105727

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Taking away bike lanes is counter intuitive to the goal that is trying to be reached. By dedicating the lanes to cars it makes active transportation impossible and more dangerous. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105728

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is clear and unnecessary overreach. Municipal governments have more knowledge of what roads and what bike lanes are more needed. I do not support this bill.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105729

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Cycling infrastructure is paramount to safer cities. Removing bike lanes will worsen congestion, not improve it. There are decades or research to support this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

105730

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm not happy to hear about the province trying to get involved in municipal affairs. Lire davantage