Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114822

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The city's own historical data from the 2011 removal of bike lanes on Jarvis shows that removing bike lanes will result in: - more accidents - more fatalities - increased costs for the city and province in healthcare, emergency and legal services - longer commute times Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114823

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To ensure the road is equitably shared between active transportation users and vehicles, ensure there is an existing alternate route with bike lane wherever bike lanes are removed or not included in design. That means specifying the alternate route as part of the process.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114824

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not agree with this. City traffic management should not be a provincial matter, the majority of MPPs elected do not live in Toronto and have limited or pigeonholed experience as to traveling in it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114825

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please don't remove existing bike lanes. I can't bear another round of mass construction along Bloor and Yonge. Let us have some peace.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114826

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed Bill 212 is an affront to local democracy, sound planning, and represents an intention on the part of the provincial government to reduce affordability and quality of life in the City of Toronto. It reflects a large, inefficient, and wasteful government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114827

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely unhappy that the Ontario Government thinks removing bike lanes in Toronto will improve traffic. I believe most statements and gestures are made to procure votes in the next election instead of for the greater good of the general public. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114828

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario government would be up in arms if the federal government encroached on affairs under the purview of the province, but has no problem doing the same to municipalities, undermining the years of expertise municipal government workers have brought to designing cycling infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114829

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Kitchener, ON, I am completely against this proposal. My wife and I rely on our bicycles as our primary mode of transportation, and the expansion of the cycling network in Kitchener has directly contributed to our safety every day. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114830

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I appreciate that some cycling lanes are underused and as a result, should be decommissioned. But this has to be done carefully. Not every underused cycling lane should be taken out, as some serve as links to create a region wide cycling grid. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114831

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Safe and connected active transportation links and well-functioning and affordable public transportation are two proven methods to reduce congestion. When people have a safe, affordable and convenient option it has been proven over and over again that they will change their habits to take it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114832

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a resident of Toronto who regularly cycles, walks, AND drives to get around, I do not support the removal of bike lanes as listed in the proposal or providing the province with the ability to review and propose other bike lane removals of other streets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114833

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose Bill 212 on the grounds that it is both unfair and unwise. First, the government should not be playing favourites with the type of constituents it makes infrastructure for - it should be working to help everyone not just those who can afford a motorized vehicle! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114834

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Once again we have a bill that undermines the importance of developing mobility options for everyone, in favour of temporary wins for drivers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114835

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Data from the EU has shown that while collisions involving cyclists or pedestrians where deaths occur are rare, thousands of pedestrians, thousands of cyclists, and thousands of other drivers are killed every year by drivers. Making the road more dangerous for cyclists is a terrible idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114837

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The new and old bike lanes make such a difference when trying to commute. Since they've updated the ones on college and university I actively choose biking over driving to work 80% of the time, even when the weather is poor, vs before when I would do it maybe 20% of the time. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114838

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The extra lanes will likely induce demand and make things worse or will just be neutral (but with more honking traffic). The Province should look for solutions that reduce the total number of cars travelling through these congested corridors.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114839

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario's roadways and their over-accommodation of dangerous, high-speed traffic are already killing hundreds of people each year. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114840

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposal to remove recently installed bike lanes in Toronto. As a careful cyclist who has experienced close calls with vehicles, the presence of protected bike lanes has been crucial for my safety and well-being. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114841

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If there are more cars on the road, there is more traffic. Because the additional cars take up more space and break more often. More cars means less room for everyone. They are crowded together (congestion.) If some people are using bikes instead of cars, there are fewer cars crowding the roads. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114842

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I very strongly oppose the proposed legislation. Deciding where to build cycling facilities, and getting the subsequent Complete Street design as part of a complete network, is a complex task. Lire davantage