Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117640

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a Toronto resident who regularly cycles for both commuting and weekend shopping, I am deeply concerned about and strongly oppose Bill 212. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117641

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Cycling downtown is an important form of transportation. As a City of Toronto home owner and taxpayer, I expect the City to make decisions consistent with City of Toronto priorities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117642

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The cost for implementing these lanes has already been spent, important infrastructure that improves travel times and safety for both bikers and drivers by reducing the number of cars on the road. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117643

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Expediting infrastructure projects should not come at the cost of democratic processes and environmental integrity. This bill warrants serious reconsideration.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117644

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I use the Bloor bike lanes that this bill proposes to rip out every day to travel within the city. It used to be so much more unsafe when the bike lane didn't exist. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117646

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This project is opposed to reducing gridlock, climate change initiatives, encouraging people to be more active, and cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers' safety. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is fundamentally flawed and at odds with the stated goals of reducing gridlock and congestion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117648

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is the wrong approach to fixing gridlock in Toronto. More roads begets more cars begets more traffic. If we must increase road lanes there are so many more things that would speed up the traffic downtown — fixing street parking to start. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While I can sympathize with my fellow bikers that bike lanes are essentially for flow of traffic and safety, I disagree that EVERY ROAD requires a bike lane. I believe Bloor St W, west of Jane street, should not be a single lane of traffic both directions and should have the bike lane removed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117650

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Municipalities should remain in control of the construction of the bike lanes. The existing network is limited and incomplete. Additional barriers to the development of the bike network is a bad decision. Removing bike lanes on streets like bloor is a bad decision. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117651

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The removal of bicycle lanes in the City of Toronto should not be done. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117652

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is not based in evidence and will not decrease bike traffic, it will only decrease safety

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117653

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We do not need more highways. We need better transit and cycling infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117654

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am an Etobicoke resident and I am opposed to the removal of existing bike lanes in Toronto. I am especially against the removal of the Bloor St bike lane. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117656

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As someone who commutes to work by bike every day, I strongly urge the city to keep the bike lanes we already have. These lanes are essential for my safety and the safety of countless other cyclists who rely on them to navigate the city. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117657

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is simple way to reduce car congestion. Give people a credible alternative that gets them out of their cars and gets them where they need to go. Separated bike lanes reduce the number of cars on the road, and protect cyclists and drivers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117658

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The removal of existing bike lanes is wildly inappropriate and an overreach of Provincial power. As someone who drives Bloor Street daily between Kipling and Runnymede, Bloor now feels much safer to drive on as cars are not zipping in and out, jockeying for position and avoiding parked cars. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117662

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If we want to reduce congestion in cities and reduce carbon emissions in Ontario more bike infrastructure is critical. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117663

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this bill. It is proven that bike lanes reduce car traffic when implemented in a way that makes the cyclist feel safe from cars. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117665

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

More bike infrastructure not less. Both my Wife and I commute by bike and car. This is a ridiculous decision, likely supported by bad data and a tax payer base who for the most part are rarely inconvenienced by a bike lane. Cyclists are a solution, not the problem!