Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing bike lanes without proposing viable alternatives is a shortsighted decision that puts cyclists and drivers at greater risk. For example, north of Bloor lacks a safe alternative to Yonge Street for cyclists traveling north-south. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120014

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a ridiculous proposal. We should be moving on initiatives to reduce personal cars rather than removing bike lanes. Removing bike lanes will not improve traffic - it will make it harder for cars and bikes to share the roads which will lead to more collisions, which also increases gridlock. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120015

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello there, I am adamantly opposed to the provincial government dictating what happens in a municipality when it comes to city planning. Why should someone in Brampton weigh in on the city planning in Toronto? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120017

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a stupid idea. Will increase red tape and not help with congestion. It will make roads less save for pedestrians and cyclists.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120018

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My whole family - grandparents, kids, adults - all use bike lanes wherever they are in place. On a daily basis. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120019

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m concerned about the environmental impact of this bill and its impact on the ability to achieve Toronto’s “TransformTO Net Zero Strategy” which has a goal that by 2030, 70% of work/school trips under 5 km will be walked, biked, or by transit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120021

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Charge a fee to enter the downtown core for non-residents. London does it, New York just adopted it. Cyclists are not going to disappear, they will be forced to bike in traffic which will result in more deaths and will not change gridlock in the slightest.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120024

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

bill 212 will leave people socially isolated, it will be bad for business, and it will destroy communities. cars don't buy things, people do.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Rich people can afford cars and driving in a car into downtown by themselves luxury and I love that for them, yay them! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120027

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a bad decision. Many people use bikes on existing bike lanes, and removing bike lanes would never improve traffic congestion but rather worsen it. Also, who would benefit from this decision? Taking away space from bike users to single occupancy vehicles polluting our environment?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120029

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object entirely to Schedule 4 - Ministry approval for bicycle lanes required. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120030

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

* Removing bike lanes: Cyclist want to go the most direct route and not through neighborhoods. They will still be on main routes BUT their lives will be endangered. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose Bill 212, which would interfere with municipal government’s authority in planning our cities according to the needs of its residents. Bike lanes are essential to keeping cyclists safe, and active transportation should be a priority, given the urgency of climate change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120033

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

it is worrying that Toronto seems to be moving backwards from progress. bike lanes ensure the safety not just of people on bicycles and other vehicles that use those lanes, but also ensures the safety of pedestrians. by removing bike lanes you are condemning people to death. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120034

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please don't get rid of bike lanes. A lot of people rely on biking to get around the city and for work. Traffic will increase because more people will be on the roads in cars rather than bikes. It's a waste of the city and province's money.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120036

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Everything about this bill goes against good governance and welfare for the people the government is meant to represent and take care of. Bicycles *ARE* traffic, they are much more efficient and climate-friendly, and they make cities much more pleasant to exist in. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

120037

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the City of Orillia - City Council.

Statut du commentaire

Comments are submitted on behalf of the Council of the Corporation of the City of Orillia. Lire davantage