I do not support any delay in enforcing producers' recycling targets. Our environment must take precedence over producers' reluctance to take responsibility for the impacts of their packaging.
Read more
July 3, 2024
Marc Peverini
Resource Recovery Policy Branch
Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks
40 St. Clair Avenue West, 8th Floor,
Toronto, Ontario M4V 1M2
Dear Mr. Peverini:
Read more
I do not agree with the portion of the amendment that pertains to the
removal of expanding the recycling program to include all multi-residential properties. I believe that all multi-
residential properties should have the opportunity to receive recycling collection services as
Read more
I do not support this amendment proposal. An increase in cost is acceptable if it allows recycling to continue and improve.
Alternative waste management options such as incineration are unacceptable for local resident health.
Read more
Changes are needed to improve this ERO process. It does not allow for the kind of comprehensive discussion that is needed to reach the best decisions for Ontario.
Read more
There are many countries in the world who have excellent rules around packaging - Norway is at the top of my list. The problem isn't that it's too difficult, its that the people making money don't want to change. But the way we package and sell stuff is unsustainable and we HAVE to change.
Read more
ITEM 1: Delay Recovery Targets for Select Material Categories
Oxford County has the following concerns with delaying recovery targets for another 5 years and suggests the deferral be reduced to maximum of three years:
Read more
I want more, not less, management of "flexible" plastic packaging (like food wrap, pouches and bags). Do not reduce the recovery target of 25%, increase it to 95%. This will send appropriate signals to manufacturers to eliminate this packaging.
Read more
Stormont Dundas and Glengarry Regional Waste Management Working Group (North Dundas, South Dundas, North Stormont, South Stormont, North Glengarry, South Glengarry)
The Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry Regional Waste Working Group, representing six local municipalities, has consolidated comments on the proposed amendments to the Ontario Regulation 391/21 (Blue Box) and are providing them jointly as follows.
***Maintaining Current Services***
Read more
The Municipality of the Town of Renfrew, opposes the removal of the planned expansion to service Multi-Residential Buildings, Schools, and Specified Long-Term Care Homes and Retirement Homes.
Read more
1. Amendment Fails to Advance Circular Economy Goals
The amendment does not help achieve a true circular economy.
It relies on municipalities to provide waste collection for small businesses and organizations, subsidizing large corporate polluters.
2. 'Polluter Pays' Principle Undermined
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Preamble: a) 'Producers'…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150759
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please see attached pdf.
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150763
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I do not support any delay…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150765
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
These proposals are a…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150768
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
July 3, 2024 Marc…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150769
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Why is the Ford government…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150773
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I do not agree with the…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150774
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I do not support this…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150791
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I oppose this amendment…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150793
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Changes are needed to…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150796
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Re: Re: Proposed amendments…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150797
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There are many countries in…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150799
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
ITEM 1: Delay Recovery…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150801
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Plastic waste producers must…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150802
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I want more, not less,…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150804
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We urge the province to…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150805
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Canadian Manufacturers &…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150808
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Stormont, Dundas and…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150809
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Municipality of the Town…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150810
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
1. Amendment Fails to…
Comment on
Amendments to the Blue Box Regulation
Comment ID
150812
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions