Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

170710

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Climate resilience depends on local ecosystems absorbing stress. The SCA undercuts that capacity by fragmenting protections and allowing piecemeal destruction. Once that resilience is gone, disaster costs will rise exponentially.

Comment ID

170711

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Weakening protections during an ecological emergency ensures future economic instability. The losses may begin with species, but they will end with people—through floods, crop failures, and contaminated water.

Comment ID

170712

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government’s own climate targets require intact ecosystems to meet carbon sequestration goals. Yet this legislation dismantles the very habitats that store carbon and regulate the atmosphere. It is policy contradiction in plain sight.

Comment ID

170713

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This bill will cause irreparable harms to human and nonhuman beings alike, regardless of their class conditions. The blind pursuit of economic growth, while all else remains collateral will be your own downfall. Reverse and repeal this action immediately. Read more

Comment ID

170714

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontario’s biodiversity is a living climate defense network. Repealing and replacing the ESA with a deregulated system dismantles that defense. Every species removed is another breach in the wall protecting us all.

Comment ID

170716

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This legislation is written to benefit those who can afford consultants, lawyers, and lobbyists. Developers will navigate the permit system with ease while species with no voice are cleared out quietly. That isn’t reform—it’s corruption by design

Comment ID

170717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The SCA creates a tiered system of access: one where industries can buy their way through registration and permitting while vulnerable species are priced out of existence. The government is auctioning off the right to destroy.

Comment ID

170718

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
When you introduce exceptions, registrations, and permits without strict independent oversight, you create loopholes. And where loopholes exist, exploitation follows. This bill invites corruption into the core of environmental law.

Comment ID

170719

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I oppose any bills or acts that harm or continue to harm our wildlife and nature. Climate crisis is real. By passing bills like this, you are killing endangered species, and endangering other species as well.

Comment ID

170721

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The species being removed from protection are not incidental. They are in the way of projects. This isn’t a neutral list. It’s a political filter—removing whatever makes extraction less convenient. The public deserves to see that clearly.

Comment ID

170724

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Public trust in environmental governance depends on consistency, transparency, and accountability. This legislation undermines all three. It gives too much power to too few people, with too little resistance to abuse.

Comment ID

170725

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Let’s be honest—this is about money. The species removed, the processes simplified, the registrations made easier—all of it is about unlocking land for commercial use. And the government is helping industry do it faster.

Comment ID

170727

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The SCA establishes an approval machine. Developers input paperwork, and destruction comes out with a stamp. This is not environmental review. It’s industrial facilitation with a conservation mask. Read more

Comment ID

170728

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
By weakening species protections, Ontario is creating long-term economic liability. Ecosystem collapse brings enormous costs—flood control failures, pest outbreaks, loss of pollination and tourism. No budget line item can replace a lost biome.

Comment ID

170729

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The idea that this legislation is “economically necessary” ignores the billions lost annually due to environmental degradation. Real economic strength is rooted in a healthy planet. Bill 5 gambles that away for short-term returns.

Comment ID

170730

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is not governance—it’s asset stripping. The province is gutting environmental safeguards to benefit private enterprise while the public absorbs the cost of species loss, water pollution, and ecological instability.