Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

170690

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No legislation that removes protections from over 100 species can be described as moderate or balanced. This is an aggressive restructuring designed to minimize resistance, legal challenge, and public scrutiny—all in service of profit.

Comment ID

170691

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are being told that this is reform. That it’s smarter, faster, better. In reality, it’s looser, weaker, and deadlier. The government wants to move quickly—not because it’s urgent, but because it hopes we won’t stop them in time.

Comment ID

170692

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Species assessments must remain in the hands of independent scientific bodies—not government departments under pressure from development agendas. These amendments destroy the firewall between science and politics. That is deliberate, and it is dangerous.

Comment ID

170693

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against this bill. I worry greatly about the planet’s impact on my children’s’ futures. I think these changes in the long run will make Ontario a worse place to live and work for Canadians.

Comment ID

170694

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The SCA places final authority for species protection into the same system responsible for approving development permits. That is a conflict of interest so obvious it should be disqualifying. Independent review is not optional—it is essential.

Comment ID

170695

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
COSSARO was created to provide impartial, evidence-based assessments of species status. Now, its classifications can be disregarded, overruled, or delayed by regulatory discretion. This breaks the scientific spine of the entire protection framework

Comment ID

170696

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The shift from expert-led designation to government-controlled listing allows political interference to shape the survival of species. Scientific accuracy becomes secondary to political convenience. This is the end of credible conservation

Comment ID

170697

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Without impartial science, the endangered species list becomes a PR tool. The government can claim progress while quietly removing species, delaying decisions, or reframing risk to match development priorities.

Comment ID

170698

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The structural integrity of any protection system depends on those who interpret the data. If the interpreters are also the developers, the outcome is predetermined. The SCA turns biodiversity into a political lever.

Comment ID

170699

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These reforms discard what made Ontario’s endangered species process credible: external, scientific, peer-reviewed input. Instead, they install a model where conservation outcomes are pre-weakened by deregulation and filtered through political goals.

Comment ID

170700

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Inverting the chain of authority—from scientists to administrators—is a clear sign that this legislation is designed to control perception, not protect life. It’s not about species. It’s about appearances.

Comment ID

170701

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The credibility of species protection depends on transparency, scientific rigor, and insulation from influence. These amendments dissolve all three. What’s left is a hollow structure that looks like law but functions like extraction policy.

Comment ID

170702

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bill 5’s amendments come at a time when Ontario’s ecosystems are already destabilized by climate change. Weakening protections now is like removing the roof in a storm—it exposes every living thing to collapse.

Comment ID

170704

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Climate adaptation is impossible without biodiversity. Every species removed from the protection list makes Ontario less resilient. The government cannot claim to prepare for the future while actively dismantling its living infrastructure.

Comment ID

170705

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Climate crises amplify every threat—drought, flood, wildfire, invasive species. Instead of reinforcing habitat protections, the SCA invites industries to accelerate extraction. This is an extinction multiplier.

Comment ID

170706

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government frames these changes as modernization, yet they ignore the reality of 2025: collapsing pollinator networks, declining freshwater fish populations, and rising temperatures. There is nothing modern about repeating the mistakes that caused this.

Comment ID

170709

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
By decoupling economic policy from ecological limits, Ontario is legislating delusion. The economy cannot thrive in a dead ecosystem. Biodiversity isn’t a luxury—it’s the operating system of the planet.