Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

47034

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Considering the totality of all the comments and concerns, outlined in the attached letter, I recommend that the plant not be approved for the location at 633 Coronation Drive, but rather be relocated to a larger industrial area at the north end of the City, where access to major 400 series highways Read more

Comment ID

47054

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Our neighbourhood is not a dumping ground. The noise pollution and environmental pollution of this proposal poses a significant risk to our health and well being. West Hill is a family-oriented residential neighbourhood. Read more

Comment ID

47056

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is appalling to learn of this proposal to build and operate a large waste processing plant in a location surrounded by residential dwellings. West Hill is a young and vibrant, family neighbourhood with many schools within 600m from the site. Read more

Comment ID

47070

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We moved to West Hill several years ago to start a family; our children are now growing and starting to explore the many parks and green spaces that adorn the area, and the neighbourhood has grown to cater to young families. Read more

Comment ID

47088

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The addition of a waste processing plant and biogas creation plant on Coronation drive, will have a negative impact on the environment and surrounding neighbourhood. The plant if created would be too close to residential areas, schools and parks, how is this safe? Or even being considered? Read more

Comment ID

47096

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The results of the recently added Traffic Impact Study are completely predictable. The review was done by a company that was hired by Coronation Organics Processing Inc. "in support of the proposed development" (1.1). Read more

Comment ID

47098

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Executive Summary: This report will analyse the submission material that was provided by the Ministry in response to ECA requests - 019-1444/019-1446 with reference numbers 8818-BKDPE7 and 2032-BKDP63 submitted by the numbered company 2683517 Ontario Inc. Read more

Comment ID

47109

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Traffic Study, The proponent agreed to conduct a traffic study at the request of the community, and while it is appreciated, it does not take into account the significant concerns the community has with the increased traffic proposed by this facility. Read more

Comment ID

47199

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am submitting the comments in my attached letter, because I am disappointed in the response received from the Ministry in reply to my City Councillor's letter, and the fact that it took two months to send the reply. Read more

Comment ID

47253

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am submitting the comments in my attached letter, because I have concerns about some deficiencies, I have identified in the JD Northcote Traffic Report, which I think could significantly affect the report conclusions. Read more