Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

62339

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
You have all the evidence at your fingertips showing why this should not be done so I won’t sit here and rewrite it in another way for you to choose to ignore. Leave the Greenbelt alone and for once, think big picture about the environmental state of this province. Read more

Comment ID

62345

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
No. Just no. The Greenbelt is not only the last semi wild home for many animals and plants, but it is also so important against flooding and mitigating the effects of climate change. Yet Ford continues to only see it as dollar signs. Development should never happen here.

Comment ID

62346

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Do not touch the Greenbelt. Simple as that. Doing so does not meaningfully address the housing crisis, and it directly contradicts the statement made last year that the Greenbelt would not be touched. It’s very clear at this point that the current government has no problem lying. Read more

Comment ID

62351

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am supportive of this change as much of the land that would is being removed abuts developed land with similar characteristics and already has services running through it. So long as the land swap to protect other land is made I don’t see an issue. Read more

Comment ID

62353

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am not in favour of this proposal. 1) The Greenbelt was set aside to protect fertile, natural, important lands including the moraine, which is responsible for clean local water, from development. We can not change the rules everytime some new government finds parts of the Greenbelt inconvenient. Read more

Comment ID

62354

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
What's the point of designating a protected Greenbelt if the government can just decide to develop over it? Developing this area is irreversible and should not undertaken so lightly especially when there are alternate solutions to housing supply concerns. Read more