Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

73946

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is plenty of land available for development in already-established cities. Then Greenbelt is one of the few natural areas left in or near the GTA and should be kept that way for all our citizens to enjoy, not to turn into further hastily designed suburban hell. Read more

Comment ID

73948

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As someone who grew up in Richmond Hill and now lives in Toronto we should not develop on the green belt. It has an important ecological role and helps to prevent flooding. Yes there is a housing crisis but this does not solve the issue. There is land already approved for development. Read more

Comment ID

73949

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Read more

Comment ID

73951

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a horrifying grift, which will not only damage irreplaceable swathes of ecologically important land, but it will have long-term negative impacts on Ontarians. Building on wetland and floodplain is foolish at best, maliciously greedy at worst. Read more

Comment ID

73954

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Read more

Comment ID

73963

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We need to support the gains made over the pandemic for work from home and review our infrastructure and housing needs within that frame. Work no longer needs to be done in a centralized location, we do not need housing density within commutable distance of those locations. Read more