Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

62199

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think it would be beneficial to the process to add properties that have acknowledged Record of Site Conditions added to the list of low-risk sites. These properties have already been assessed by a QP and have been approved by the MECP. Read more

Comment ID

62650

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I believe that agricultural sites -, parkland, residential and institutional use are already exempt under section 14 of O Reg 406/19. In addition I have concerns about the definition of low risk projects or projects that are just under the new requirements

Comment ID

63186

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against this amendment to the regulation. Although the legislation is about excess soil and ensuring topsoil is listed as a re-use, local authorities also see it as a tracking measure to lessen the impacts of improper soil use. Read more

Comment ID

67745

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I remain concerned that excess soil rules needlessly restrict reuse of soils excavated during the course of normal routine work on municipal infrastructure. For example, soils removed during the replacement of sewer and water pipes or soils removed to facilitate repair of a main break. Read more

Comment ID

69193

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As part of this proposal, would the MECP be willing to clarify the exemption of Section 8 (planning requirements) for projects outside of an area of settlement (which don't include any of the other 'triggers,' i.e. Read more

Comment ID

71109

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Soil Regulation Task Force

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Every year thousands of trucks carry 25 million cubic meters of soil around the province looking for a place to dispose of it (QUANTIFICATION of Excess Construction Soils in Ontario by the Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario). Read more

Comment ID

71335

Commenting on behalf of

Drewlo Holdings

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed changes don’t rectify some of the most problematic components of the regulation including: 1. Significant environmental impacts – O. Reg 406/19 yields an estimated increase in CO2E of approximately 90,000 tonnes/year. Read more

Comment ID

73396

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Association of Cemetery and Funeral Professionals (OACFP)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The OACFP represents most of the bereavement profession’s active operators within the province. Our membership consists of cemetery, funeral home, crematorium, and transfer service operators from across the province as well as many other stakeholders within the bereavement sector. Read more

Comment ID

73483

Commenting on behalf of

Landscape Ontario Horticultural Trades Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Landscape Ontario Horticultural Trades Association represents over 3,300 businesses in the landscape trades in Ontario. Our members design, build, maintain our green spaces. They grow our plants, shrubs, annuals, perennials, and our trees. Read more

Comment ID

75821

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
United Soils recognizes the need for the excess soil regulation to support urban development and projected provincial growth. We are concerned that the proposed changes to the regulation will not adequately control the placement of potentially contaminated soil at unregulated fill sites. Read more