Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62181

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It seems disingenuous to water down regulations that haven't yet been enacted, without input from all steakholders, not just the ones looking to reduce costs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62199

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think it would be beneficial to the process to add properties that have acknowledged Record of Site Conditions added to the list of low-risk sites. These properties have already been assessed by a QP and have been approved by the MECP. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed change to exempt low risk sites adds more complexity in interpreting this regulation with respect to naturally occurring parameters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

62650

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe that agricultural sites -, parkland, residential and institutional use are already exempt under section 14 of O Reg 406/19. In addition I have concerns about the definition of low risk projects or projects that are just under the new requirements

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

63186

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against this amendment to the regulation. Although the legislation is about excess soil and ensuring topsoil is listed as a re-use, local authorities also see it as a tracking measure to lessen the impacts of improper soil use. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64441

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If my agricultural/residential site is exporting 100,000 m3 of soil to a receiving site, and historical testing confirmed that there were no exceedances, does this characterize my agricultural/residential site as low-risk?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

67745

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I remain concerned that excess soil rules needlessly restrict reuse of soils excavated during the course of normal routine work on municipal infrastructure. For example, soils removed during the replacement of sewer and water pipes or soils removed to facilitate repair of a main break. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69193

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As part of this proposal, would the MECP be willing to clarify the exemption of Section 8 (planning requirements) for projects outside of an area of settlement (which don't include any of the other 'triggers,' i.e. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71109

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Soil Regulation Task Force

Statut du commentaire

Every year thousands of trucks carry 25 million cubic meters of soil around the province looking for a place to dispose of it (QUANTIFICATION of Excess Construction Soils in Ontario by the Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71335

Commentaire fait au nom

Drewlo Holdings

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes don’t rectify some of the most problematic components of the regulation including: 1. Significant environmental impacts – O. Reg 406/19 yields an estimated increase in CO2E of approximately 90,000 tonnes/year. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71735

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The changes made to the soils regulations have offered guidance and clarity in regards to management of soils that have significant risks. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73111

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Rescinding the soil regulations for “low risk” sites will allow illegal dumping to continue unabated. Illegal dumping has been a big problem for rural municipalities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73396

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Association of Cemetery and Funeral Professionals (OACFP)

Statut du commentaire

The OACFP represents most of the bereavement profession’s active operators within the province. Our membership consists of cemetery, funeral home, crematorium, and transfer service operators from across the province as well as many other stakeholders within the bereavement sector. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73483

Commentaire fait au nom

Landscape Ontario Horticultural Trades Association

Statut du commentaire

The Landscape Ontario Horticultural Trades Association represents over 3,300 businesses in the landscape trades in Ontario. Our members design, build, maintain our green spaces. They grow our plants, shrubs, annuals, perennials, and our trees. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75821

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

United Soils recognizes the need for the excess soil regulation to support urban development and projected provincial growth. We are concerned that the proposed changes to the regulation will not adequately control the placement of potentially contaminated soil at unregulated fill sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75922

Commentaire fait au nom

Region of Peel

Statut du commentaire

Dear Ms. Kureishy, Region of Peel staff have reviewed the proposed amendments to certain requirements under the Excess Soil Regulation and appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback to the Province. Lire davantage