Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

95382

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Re ERO #019-8010 CRH Canada Group Inc. I am not sure why CRH’s formal Proposal is not available online, on the Environmental Registry website. I am therefore commenting on CRH’s Plain Language Summary handout provided at their open house on December 6, 2023. Read more

Comment ID

95391

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have lived in the Clarkson area for over 50 years. This area has grown substantially over the years, and continues to do so. The quality of our air has always been an issue with the various industries located in our area. Read more

Comment ID

95408

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
They had five years to comply with new environmental standards. At the 11th hour they state they cannot comply and ask for another seven years? Even considering an extension is ridiculous. Where is the corporate responsibility with this enterprise? Read more

Comment ID

95411

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, Would like to know what the short-term and long-term health effects are to those living in the neighborhood. I've reviewed the Plain Language Summary and these details aren't adequately addressed. Please assist with clarifying/elaborating. Thanks!

Comment ID

95538

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To the best of my knowledge, there has been no communication (written, meetings) with the community about this proposal. Surely, there must be a requirement for communication, particularly if the Approval includes the addition of new or previously unapproved sources of emissions. Read more

Comment ID

95678

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This just seems soooo wrong! Why is a country like Canada lagging so far behind countries like Germany in reducing sulphur and nitrogen emissions? 10 more years of Ash Grove Cement emissions beyond acceptable levels should not be happening. Let's take better care of our environment!

Comment ID

95748

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a neighbour of the cement factory, I would like it on the record that I do not agree to allowing this company any exemptions or modifications to controlled emissions of toxic chemicals if it means more chemicals in my environment. These chemicals have serious health repercussions. Read more

Comment ID

95751

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It absolutely rediculous that this is even being considered. They had been given PLENTY of time to correct their emissions output and disregarded it. Now AFTER the final day of change they are asking for more time? How rediculous! Read more

Comment ID

95752

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly against Ash Grove proceeding with releasing harmful chemicals into the air as it is extremely harmful to humans. This can cause severe respitory problems in both adults and children and can worsen when exercising. Read more

Comment ID

95753

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a resident of Clarkson, and am writing to express my strong opposition to the application submitted by CRH Canada Group, as outlined in ERO Notice No. 019-8010, requesting an exception to increase operational pollution. Read more

Comment ID

95757

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to increasing these emissions. We do not know what the long term impacts are on our health and this is a family oriented community. The emissions should be cut down not increased. Ash grove has a poor record when it comes to environmental impacts. How can they be trusted? Read more

Comment ID

95758

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I would like to think in this current climate of environmental awareness that any request to increase pollutants would be denied. This does not appear to comply or support Canadians commitment to achieving net-zero emissions. Read more