Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

149752

Commenting on behalf of

The Corporation of the County of Brant

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this posting. The County of Brant has provided comments in the form of an attached staff report approved by Council. To summarize the comments of staff, the following is also provided: Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

149768

Commenting on behalf of

City of Burlington

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on ERO posting 025-0463. Please see attached an electronic submission from the City of Burlington. Below are the key points extracted from the submission, c/o of City's Community Planning Department. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

149858

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
A la lecture du projet de règlement proposé en vertu de la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire visant à réglementer les variations de plein droit par rapport aux exigences de marge de recul applicables à certains terrains, le Conseil des Écoles Catholiques du Centre Est (CECCE) salue le projet et re Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

149913

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support as of right minor variances for 10% changes to setbacks without additional criteria. Minor variance permission with 10% or less as the only criteria does not guarantee that the proposed change meets the four tests. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150018

Commenting on behalf of

City of Kawartha Lakes

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The attached document details our comments, which can be summarized as follows: - we agree that minor variances can take a disproportionate amount of time and effort, but the proposed 'as-of-right' 10% reduction in yard setbacks requires further refinement and consideration. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150117

Commenting on behalf of

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements (ERO 025 0463). Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150152

Commenting on behalf of

City of Brampton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To Whom It May Concern, The City of Brampton appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the legislative changes introduced through Bill 17, Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act, 2025, and associated regulatory postings on the Environmental Registry of Ontario. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150155

Commenting on behalf of

Railway Association of Canada

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Railway Association of Canada (RAC), representing nearly 60 freight and passenger railway operators across Canada, agrees with the proposed regulation excluding certain lands from the as-of-right variation provisions, specifically those near existing or planned railway infrastructure. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150160

Commenting on behalf of

Starlight Investments

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We commend the Province for taking valuable steps to create an environment that is conducive to housing creation. Looking ahead, we believe there is a valuable opportunity to build on this progress. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

Proposed Regulation – As-of-right Variations from Setback Requirements

Comment ID

150163

Commenting on behalf of

Township of The Archipelago

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of The Township of The Archipelago, in general, objects to the proposed legislation and strongly discourages the province to extend the “as-of-right” variances to other Zoning By-law provisions or areas.

Related actions