Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

141848

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Focus major development on infertile land, do not destroy our forests, farmland, conservation areas as they are very important to our survival along with protecting endangered species. Read more

Comment ID

142328

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
People have worked hard to advocate for bird friendly design in municipal building codes. Toronto in particular is on a major bird migratory route and is a hotspot for bird strikes on our glass heavy building designs. Bird Friendly glass is often even made in Ontario creating jobs. Read more

Comment ID

142812

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"Exempting approvals for municipal agreements and ancillary TOC project agreements: Order In Council approval is required to enter into agreements, which can slow down execution. Read more

Comment ID

144885

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removal of approvals in decision-making is a sign of exclusion of the people and parties that are most impacted by the expansion. At no cost can we allow any organization to have full authority to make changes that impact real people and communities. Read more

Comment ID

145628

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Argument Against Bill 17 Bill 17 should not be passed because it prioritizes speed and developer interests over meaningful public consultation, environmental protection, and equitable community development. 1. Undermines Public Consultation and Local Democracy Read more

Comment ID

149366

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Regarding Bill 17. This is such a short sighted, greedy bill being proposed by our current government. There are far better and longer lasting avenues to create jobs and prosperity within Ontario that are much less harmful and more profitable than what this government is proposing. Read more

Comment ID

149372

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing the requirement for wind studies in Bill 17, specifically "Wind: information and material related to the potential impacts of a proposed development on wind conditions in surrounding areas." may place pedestrians in uncomfortable and dangerous situations. Read more

Comment ID

149380

Commenting on behalf of

Town of Oakville

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Detailed Town of Oakville Comments can be found in the attachment. For detailed feedback on the broader definition of “provincial transit project”, please refer to comments provided relevant to Schedule 5 of the Metrolinx Act section. Schedule 5 of the Metrolinx Act: Read more

Comment ID

149384

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am concerned that municipalities will no longer have the automatics ability to have developers submit studies for traffic, shade/sun and wind studies as a condition for a "complete application". Read more

Comment ID

149422

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I'm opposed to this bill which undermines well-established planning regulations that protect individuals and communities from predatory developers. I also oppose its implications for building energy-efficient housing which is essential to achieving a sustainable climate. Read more

Comment ID

149489

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Urban Forest Council

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ontario Urban Forest Council urges the Province to revise Bill 17 before it proceeds further. While we support the goal of increasing affordable housing, this legislation, as drafted, will severely weaken the tools municipalities use to protect and expand urban forests. Read more

Comment ID

149491

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Bill needs a lot of work before it should be allowed to pass. • Changing the definition of TOC is not clear. How can I trust that the Conservative government will create TOCs where they are actually needed vs where they just want or their developers want? Read more