Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

179693

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Some density is fine but this proposal squashes too many people in to the area proposed. Have you seen how busy the roads are already? Gridlock will be the result of poor, over-greedy planning. Read more

Comment ID

179695

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179698

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179699

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179700

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179704

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The economic and viability case for these MZOs and this project has collapsed. The condominium market has both collapsed and shifted, with the market no longer supporting high rise projects dominated by studios and one-bedroom units, which is the configuration this TOC proposes. Read more

Comment ID

179705

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal should NEVER go ahead. The City of Oakville does not need the Province’s input to plan a reasonable and sustainable housing community. Oakville was not awarded the title of Best City in Canada to Live, a couple of years ago, because it was poorly planned in the past. Read more

Comment ID

179706

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We are against mega-density housing in south oakville near the Oakville GO station. We don't have the infrastructure and I don't want it either. We have way too much traffic on Trafalgar and Cornwall and collisons without more housing. Please help to stop this.

Comment ID

179707

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I've lived in Oakville for 40 years and too often I've seen poorly planned developments in the GTA choke communities through unmanagable density creation. Read more

Comment ID

179710

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Oakville Town Council is best placed to determine sustainable development for this area. The proposed MZO is insulting to local residents. No effort was made to meaningfully consult with all stakeholders. The MZO proposes development that does not align with what young home buyers are looking for. Read more

Comment ID

179713

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179714

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The economic and viability case for these MZOs and this project has collapsed. The condominium market has both collapsed and shifted, with the market no longer supporting high rise projects dominated by studios and one-bedroom units, which is the configuration this TOC proposes. Read more

Comment ID

179717

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

179718

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not believe that this proposal is in keeping with what the Government of Ontario should be trying to accomplish. The proposal is adding ultra high density to an area that does not have the infrastructure to support such density. Read more