Commentaire
I have concerns about Bill 108 for the following reasons.
It would take away local communities's right to say what is important to them, what parts of the past the community values and wishes to pass on to future generations. It would give this authority to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal(LPAT), who can undo the work of democratically elected councils - and the Municipal Heritage Committees and trained heritage planning staff who support them. LPAT will have the final say on approving, revoking or amending heritage protection bylaws.
Compounding the problem: No current LPAT members have any background in heritage. Nor are they required to have heritage expertise or an understanding of the values of the community they are judging.
We do not need this radical departure. The current regulations 9/06 and 10/06 work. They provide criteria that help ensure communities are objective and consistent across Ontario. The specialist Conservation Review Board (CSB) reviews municipalities' work and provides an expeditious , low-cost slternative to lemgthy LPAT appeals. Don't change a rule that is working.
What's the rush? Take time to properly consult with the heritage an municipal sectors and get this right.
Take Schedule 11, Ontario Heritage Act out of Bill 108.
Soumis le 1 juin 2019 6:10 PM
Commentaire sur
Projet de loi n°108 - (annexe n°11) - Loi de 2019 Pour Plus de Logements et Plus de Choix proposé : modification de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario
Numéro du REO
019-0021
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
32009
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire