Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.
Hydro-electricity is commonly described as "green". Although it may be renewable, electricity generated from dams does have significant environmental impacts.
I am greatly concerned about projected cost of nuclear electricity in Ontario. More so that the costs do not account for full environmental remediation.
Protection of the environment needs to be the number one priority for the canadian government. Otherwise we are making life impossible on Earth for future generations.
I am concerned about Ontario's commitment to centralized nuclear power rather than the renewable sources that whose costs are falling and whose decentralized creation is more appropriate to the climate scientist's warnings of severe erratic weather conditions. These conditions can badly aff
I have had a MicroFIT solar PV installation since 2011 and have been very pleased with the way Ontario has handled this program so far, adjusting the price repeatedly to reflect the drop in price of such installations. All the more am I disappointed about the apparent recent change of direc
Ontario is already 35% renewable energy, we should not make our goal only 50% renewable energy! We need 100% renewable energy! NOW! If we don't think big, it won't happen. Do it for our grandchildren! Ontario is a leading province in North America!
In my view the main priority on energy for the Ontario government is to accelerate the transition away from dependence on fossil fuels and nuclear power. Both of these are dangerous, indeed toxic, to the earth and to the humans who live on the earth. This has been documented for decad
Why are we still talking about increases in nuclear energy, when what we really need is renewable energy? We have been talking about renewables for decades, and are still lagging far behind other countries, who have created tens of thousands of jobs in renewable energy.
A Nuclear Phase out is the most practical way to go for the long term. If we care about leaving a healthy planet for the future generations, we have to have alternate methods. Nuclear power is not safe and the waste cannot be practically stored.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Ontario Long Term Energy Plan (LTEP). I believe that the LTEP puts too much reliance on nuclear power, and that Ontario should invest the money earmarked for rebuilding nuclear reactors into renewable energy instead.
I am writing to ask that the Ontario government aim towards a 100% renewable energy policy. I am not sure that wind-farms are the answer as there seem to be problems with them. However, as evidenced recently in Japan,, nuclear energy is potentially very dangerous. Thank yo
For the sustainability of present and future generations, a 100% renewable Ontario is crucial.. Make the transition from dependence on nuclear and fossil fuels to 100% reliance on renewable sources of energy.
Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.
Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.
Télécharger les commentaires
Hydro-electricity is…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4331
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Hydro-electricity is commonly described as "green". Although it may be renewable, electricity generated from dams does have significant environmental impacts.
Lire davantageRelated actions
I am greatly concerned about…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4332
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
I am greatly concerned about projected cost of nuclear electricity in Ontario. More so that the costs do not account for full environmental remediation.
Related actions
Protection of the…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4333
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Protection of the environment needs to be the number one priority for the canadian government. Otherwise we are making life impossible on Earth for future generations.
[Original Comment ID: 205838]
Related actions
I am concerned about Ontario…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4334
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
I am concerned about Ontario's commitment to centralized nuclear power rather than the renewable sources that whose costs are falling and whose decentralized creation is more appropriate to the climate scientist's warnings of severe erratic weather conditions. These conditions can badly aff
Lire davantageRelated actions
The following chart is from…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4335
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
The following chart is from the IESO – Generators Output and Capabilities Report, Nov 17, 2016.
The demand was for 15,066 MWh per hour (Sorry - Chart did not copy correctly)
NUCLEAR Total - Capability -9808 - Output - 9845
Lire davantageRelated actions
As we can discern from many…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4336
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
As we can discern from many events, both recent and over the past 30 years or more, climate change is not longer a 'possible' but a 'given'.
Lire davantageRelated actions
Recommendations for…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4337
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Recommendations for providing green energy at a reasonable cost.
-Cancel all renewable energy contracts awarded but not yet built
Lire davantageRelated actions
I have had a MicroFIT solar…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4338
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
I have had a MicroFIT solar PV installation since 2011 and have been very pleased with the way Ontario has handled this program so far, adjusting the price repeatedly to reflect the drop in price of such installations. All the more am I disappointed about the apparent recent change of direc
Lire davantageRelated actions
Ontario is already 35%…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4339
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Ontario is already 35% renewable energy, we should not make our goal only 50% renewable energy! We need 100% renewable energy! NOW! If we don't think big, it won't happen. Do it for our grandchildren! Ontario is a leading province in North America!
Lire davantageRelated actions
In my view the main priority…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4340
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
In my view the main priority on energy for the Ontario government is to accelerate the transition away from dependence on fossil fuels and nuclear power. Both of these are dangerous, indeed toxic, to the earth and to the humans who live on the earth. This has been documented for decad
Lire davantageRelated actions
Why are we still talking…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4341
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Why are we still talking about increases in nuclear energy, when what we really need is renewable energy? We have been talking about renewables for decades, and are still lagging far behind other countries, who have created tens of thousands of jobs in renewable energy.
Lire davantageRelated actions
A Nuclear Phase out is the…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4342
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
A Nuclear Phase out is the most practical way to go for the long term. If we care about leaving a healthy planet for the future generations, we have to have alternate methods. Nuclear power is not safe and the waste cannot be practically stored.
Related actions
Ontario should sign more…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4343
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Ontario should sign more long-term deals with Quebec to import lower cost and safer water power
Ontario should set a target of moving to 100% renewable energy by 2050
Related actions
Thank you for the…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4344
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Ontario Long Term Energy Plan (LTEP). I believe that the LTEP puts too much reliance on nuclear power, and that Ontario should invest the money earmarked for rebuilding nuclear reactors into renewable energy instead.
Lire davantageRelated actions
· Ontario should set a…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4345
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
· Ontario should set a target of moving to 100% renewable energy by 2050
· Ontario should maximize efficiency by paying full value (e.g., equal to the cost of nuclear) for conservation kilowatts
Related actions
I am writing to ask that the…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4346
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
I am writing to ask that the Ontario government aim towards a 100% renewable energy policy. I am not sure that wind-farms are the answer as there seem to be problems with them. However, as evidenced recently in Japan,, nuclear energy is potentially very dangerous. Thank yo
Lire davantageRelated actions
Close the nuclear plants and…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4347
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Close the nuclear plants and develop clean sustainable energy and make all Ontarians pay for the cost.
Thanks,
John Bailey
[Original Comment ID: 206822]
Lire davantageRelated actions
For the sustainability of…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4348
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
For the sustainability of present and future generations, a 100% renewable Ontario is crucial.. Make the transition from dependence on nuclear and fossil fuels to 100% reliance on renewable sources of energy.
[Original Comment ID: 205914]
Related actions
Dear Minister, The trend…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4349
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Dear Minister,
Related actions
We must focus on development…
Commentaire sur
Planning Ontario's Energy Future: A Discussion Guide to Start the Conversation.
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
4350
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
We must focus on development of renewable sources of energy. Moving to 100% renewable as soon is possible, in 2050 or even sooner.
We must support conservation of energy, we waste huge amounts of power currently.
Related actions