Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18947

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have reviewed the proposed legislative changes referred to as ‘Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018’ or Bill 66. Of great concern to me are the changes which are detailed in: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18962

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 66 for a number of reasons. I might also add that the guile and haste with which it was introduced and then giving such a brief opportunity for submissions, is very objectionable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

18999

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I concur with the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) when they state that "Bill 66 represents an unprecedented and unacceptable attack on legislative provisions which currently safeguard environmental quality and public health and safety throughout Ontario." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19013

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

#1 Please DO NOT repeal this Act. The provincial MOE needs to be able to tract and monitor all toxic substances produced in this province and report that to our elected MPP's and their leader. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19015

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

DO NOT REPEAL THE TOXCS REDUCTION ACT. I take offense with the current government of Ontario position that by eliminating the Toxics Reduction Act it is cutting unnecessary regulations that are inefficient, inflexible or out of date. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19040

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Act does not represent a burden to business, it represents a responsibility to conduct business without damaging the environment. this act must not be repealed.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19044

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66, specifically Schedules 5 and 10, jeopardizes quality of life for Ontarians, present and future. This Bill concerns me in many ways: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support Bill 66 and, in particular, Schedule 5. I am very concerned that the Bill threatens human and wildlife health through increased exposure to toxic chemicals. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19128

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Comments on Bill 66 - Schedule 5 Based on years of experience dealing with the shortcomings of an application to re-open an old toxic landfill in: • class one wetland • in Carolinian forest • on land that was part of the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19150

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Toxics Reduction Act is important because it imposes a burden on the polluter to develop a plan to reduce chemical and toxic substances released. The federal act does not make that requirement, but sets national standards. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19164

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for reading my comments about this proposal. I reside in Hamilton, Ontario and am very concerned about the proposal to change the Toxics Reduction Act, leaving Ontarians, wildlife, agricultural land and drinking water vulnerable to further contamination from industrial pollutants. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19257

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Act should not be repealed as part of an omnibus bill. Much more time and public awareness and input are required.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19306

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Breaking the promise not to open up the Greenbelt, Lake Simcoe Watershed, the Oak Ridges Moraine and source water protection areas to new development shows a fundamental disrespect to voters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19408

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very much opposed to Bill 66, in particular the changes in Schedules 5 and 10 that would weaken or even remove our current protection on water, wild life and agricultural lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19409

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very much opposed to Bill 66, in particular the changes in Schedules 5 and 10 that would weaken or even remove our current protection on water, wild life and agricultural lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19415

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed “The Toxics Reduction Program has not achieved meaningful reductions. Preliminary results indicate an overall reduction of 0.04% of substances used, created and released for all regulated facilities.” From your own ero site. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19441

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a young professional living in Hamilton, and I care deeply about the Greenbelt, Lake Simcoe, the Oak Ridges Moraine and clean water. It is home to farmland, forests, watersheds and wetlands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19537

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have serious concern about Repeal of the Toxics Reduction Act. Such action will reduce the overall safety of Ontarians by reducing the accountability of industries that use or produce substances harmful to the environment and to human health, or that release such substances as byproducts. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Look at other countries currently struggling with huge pollution issues due to ignorance ( some of it wilful ) of sound and scientifically proven environmental practices. Lets use that big frontal cortex Lire davantage