Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31633

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE REGRESSIVE NATURE OF BILL 108. We believe that endangered species must be protected, that --developers must NOT be allowed to pay-to-proceed to damage or destroy significant habitat and species; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31637

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Burlington

Statut du commentaire

Bill 108 proposes full range of legislative changes intended, by the Province, to increase the supply of housing that is affordable for Ontario families while providing them with more choices on where to live, work and raise their families. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31639

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I work at Archaeological Research Associates (Ltd.) our company has 30 full time workers and 65 seasonal staff. Our company has concerns about the proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31641

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Markham

Statut du commentaire

The attachment contains the City of Markham's comments on proposed Bill 108 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31643

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the City of Hamilton, I am pleased to provide this letter as Hamilton’s submission on Schedule 11 of Bill 108. Please find attached to this letter an outline of the key submissions the City wishes to make on the proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 108 will make it more difficult to secure parks, community services and facilities through development, while simultaneously making it more likely that developers will challenge municipalities through the legal system. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31648

Commentaire fait au nom

Archaeological Research Associates Ltd.

Statut du commentaire

I have a number of concerns about proposed changes to the way in which heritage is managed in the province. Rather than summarize them here, I have included them in an attachment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31665

Commentaire fait au nom

Six Nations of the Grand River Elected Council

Statut du commentaire

There are many areas of concern we at the Six Nations of the Grand River have regarding Bill 108. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31667

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am from Toronto and have read the bill. I like the idea of more transparency from Tarion. I'll withhold my praise until I see the regulations. There are a number of things i do not like: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31669

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are serious flaws in Schedule 11, and it should be removed from Bill 108. My concerns are: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31671

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object in the strongest possible terms to Bill 108 on the grounds that discussion of the local impacts at the municipality level has not been given the same opportunity for input as the building industry. This is very undemocratic in my view. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31678

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose this Bill. I want less not more control in the hands of developers and want the government to listen to city planners over developers. Please make sure control over development decisions lies with the municipalities in which it will be built.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31683

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Collingwood

Statut du commentaire

Pease see comments on Bill 108 Schedules 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,11, 12 under signature of the CAO Town of Collingwood, Fareed Amin. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31697

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of The Archipelago

Statut du commentaire

See Resolution below passed by Council for The Township of The Archipelago on May 17, 2019. Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 19-078 Moved by Councillor Ashley Seconded by Councillor Frost Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31706

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 11 of Bill 108 should be withdrawn because it does serious damage to Ontario’s protection policies for heritage buildings and archaeological sites by undermining established assessment and conservation rules that actually work well. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31708

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Statut du commentaire

As a result of the Provincial government’s recent introduction of Bill 108, More Homes, More Choices Act, 2019, Waterloo Regional Council undertook a review of the amendments to the varied pieces of legislation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto, in Canada (the "Archdiocese"), I attach my letter and a Lehman & Associates letter containing requests and comments. In summary, the Archdiocese's comments are: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1) Clearing up the legislation – The reordering/renumbering of the sections and the rewording of sections attempts to clarify the legislation. This is the best selling point. This includes items like Section 9: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

31726

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a member of ACO Cambridge and North Dumfries and heritage matters to me. I am deeply concerned about Bill 108 - (Schedule 11) - the proposed More Homes, More Choices Act: Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act: Lire davantage