Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68610

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is outrageous. You don't need to take allocated green space. It has already been proven that there is enough land available for new housing without encroaching on green space. This is dictatorial.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68618

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This plan should continue with existing circumstantial requirements as previously approved. Making the plan redundant at the current stage could jeopardize other factors to the density level being created here with regard to the National climate change initiatives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68689

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Revoking the Official Plan for these lands is a mistake. Development takes time. When developers start the process, they need guarantees that their proposal will be considered. Official Plans give them that guarantee. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68801

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This conservative government under Doug Ford has no credibility for acting on behalf of the people of Ontario. The decisions this government makes are to assist very wealthy developers and land owners to make even more wealth. Leave duffins creek alone. We fought for it already! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68896

Commentaire fait au nom

Anglican Creation Caretakers Ajax/Pickering

Statut du commentaire

A submission with respect to the Revocation of the Pickering Planning Act and Bill 23 citing concerns regarding urban sprawl rather than densification, environmental destruction including increased flood risks, wetland destruction, loss of farmland and species extinction. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69112

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 23 and associated policy proposals that would weaken environmental protections and undermine public involvement in land use planning and decision-making. I am particularly concerned about the: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69772

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned that the changes proposed by the government will both *not* improve the housing situation in Ontario *and* undermine local authorities that are already successfully carrying out planned activities in their regions. To quote the proposal: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69809

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is another example of removing democratic representation and regional authority over lands in Ontario. It also will threaten the integrity of the Duffins Rouge agricultural and natural preserve.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

69994

Commentaire fait au nom

Oshawa Durham Region Metis Councillor

Statut du commentaire

Which indigenous group did you notify? Did you involve The Metis Nation of Ontario or the Oshawa Durham Region Metis council?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70376

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose revoking the Central Pickering Development Plan or any development on the Duffins-Rouge Agricultural Preserve. Please leave our greenbelt and wet lands alone. Mary

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70483

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Firstly you should not build on protected greenbelt. Secondly you should not be just building single family homes that no one can afford. There should be a mixture of options for families, singles and seniors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70489

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The elimination/voiding of the plan is not acceptable -- the objectives that were put in place with this plan should remain as they are -- if it is not broke do not try to fix it -- we need to work to adjust density & encourage smaller more affordable homes in existing approve for development Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70647

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If you insist on proceeding with this absolutely reprehensible dereliction of your duty to protect agricultural land and wetland in favour of low-density shortsighted housing schemes that benefit only wealthy developers, I trust you will keep in mind that you have no mandate from the people of Picke Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We don't need 50,000 homes that the people of Ontario can afford except foreign investors, and a very few percentages. This release to developers will destroy the richest farmland in Ontario. You can NOT eat concrete. This land is actually Mohawk land and breeches Treaty rights. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71000

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Central Pickering Development Plan as written looks like an excellent piece of policy if followed. The things that are called 'burdens' in this proposal are actually protection for lands that are: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Developing on existing Greenbelt areas, which were designated as such for a reason, is a decision with very long-term effects, which are irreversable, and which will negatively affect us, our children and future generations. Lire davantage