Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64511

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No, do not change the green belt boundaries. Forest and river ecosystems take time to grow and develop. Simply moving the boundary back does not grow a new forest overnight. It takes years to grow something that takes minutes to destroy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64517

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop destroying valuable land for urban sprawl Ontario government released reports saying this isn't benifital to our economy or ecosystem stop allowing unnecessary greed and selfishness.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I and many others are steadfastly against this proposal. There are other options to densify the GTA instead of add more sprawl. This will end up causing more problems and disaster issues down the road. Where are the scientific studies to show the effects of this plan?!?!?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64604

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

i am vehemently opposed to sacrificing protected greenbelt for the benefit of either road construction or housing. the designation was meant to give lasting conservation of land critical to the already declining health of the environment. find another way.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64620

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support any removal of Greenbelt land for development, including housing. Urban sprawl is not the way forward to adding homes in Ontario. We need to add density and services to support that density in our cities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64623

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removal of Greenbelt designation from certain areas for housing development is an irresponsible precedent to set for future governments, regardless of party affiliation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64649

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is irresponsible to sacrifice land that is valuable to many, for luxury residences for a few. This new proposal to reduce the Greenbelt refutes the goals of - and diminishes the government's commitment to - environmental stewardship. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64663

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

What are you doing? Why are you backtracking on Ford's election promises. We as a province, country and world cannot keep eliminating green space and agricultural space. Shameful.... Ford stated he is for the people but clearly is not!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64668

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill favours only property developers at the cost of the well-being of the environment and many residents! Atrocious!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64755

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doug Ford promised not to touch the greenbelt. The situation hasn't changed, he just blatantly lied. Changing the Greenbelt will result in destruction of wetlands in addition to decreased flood prevention and decreased quality and quantity of drinking water. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64769

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a citizen of Ontario living in the golden horseshoe I strongly oppose the development of the greenbelt. We need the greenbelt to support our local environment, including the prevention of flooding and preservation of biodiversity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64772

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Urban sprawl is bad. We know this and experience across North America supports it. It's bad for the environment, bad for creating livable communities, and bad for the public purse. The proposed amendments allow for more sprawl in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64788

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop this nonsense. We all know that the people who need homes won't be able to afford the million dollar, poorly built monstrosities that you want to construct far away from any amenities! This is very clearly Ford's plan to put money into the pockets of developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64819

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not sell out Ontarians. I know my statement may sound biased, but selling out drinking water filtration system for some businesses is short sited and flawed. Grow our transit system, allow for smoother inter city travel and facilitate multiple business hubs in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64846

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Really very against this very bad idea- please do not redevelop the greenbelt. Most ontarians do NOT want this! Once we give it up, we can never get it back.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64865

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am absolutely opposed to this amendment. We should not be removing parts of the Greenbelt area in order to meet housing demand. The housing crisis cannot be solved by developing on greenfields. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

64868

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am absolutely opposed to the amendment and changes. This is a huge step back and backpedalling on the Ford government's promises to not touch the Greenbelt. We should not be removing parts of the Greenbelt area in order to meet housing demand. Lire davantage