Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70991

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to the removal of areas in the Protected Countryside and Natural Heritage Systems designations in the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, and the re-designation of these lands as Settlement areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70996

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a terrible mistake, it should not be put through. Once the green belt is paved over or more houses are built on it…there is no going back. Doug Ford promised he would not touch the green belt and as soon as he was elected …he flipped on his promise. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71092

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm disappointed to see that this is even becoming an option. The Oak Ridges Moraine is responsible for most of your water supply. Messing with Moraine will make the gta worse off over time. I do agree that we need to expand development but the Moraine should not be part of this expansion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71104

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Questionable timing for developers to have purchased land adjacent to the greenbelt! I very much disagree with the development of these sensitive lands. Please stop pandering to the folks who live in the yellowbelt of the GTA. Opportunity exists in improving density of housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71273

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

All areas of greenbelt land in Southern Ontario must be preserved, particularly farmland to prevent potential food insecurity. Therefore I am strongly against this proposal. Infill is more appropriate than the sprawl being proposed by this government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

71367

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

"Greenbelts and other environmentally sensitive areas must be protected, and farms provide food and food security." Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72736

Commentaire fait au nom

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

Please provide Board-endorsed comments from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, as attached in the transmittal letter from Chris Jones, MCIP, RPP, Director of Planning and Regulation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72751

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Town of Georgina

Statut du commentaire

Town Council for the Corporation of the Town of Georgina passed a resolution during its November 22, 2022 Special Council meeting expressing serious concerns with proposed Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022. I have attached Council's resolution in its entirely for your consideration. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73500

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ERO submission #019-6218 I object to the proposal to redesignate lands in the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area for residential development. This proposal would undo decades of work to protect environmentally important land. An article in Ecology and Society nicely summarizes this: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73940

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to Bill 23 which includes ERO-019-6216 /6217 /6218. This action is regressive and will not result in more homes built faster. All Bill 23 and Bill 39 will do is cost the taxpayer bilions of dollars and make developers wealthier. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74060

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt needs to continue to be conserved natural land. Once "redesignated" (destroyed), it's gone for good. There is a catastrophic amount of natural land being bulldozed for the use of the rich to develop as they please. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74188

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

the Oak Ridges Moraine conservation plan must remain intact and cannot be re-designated for development. I am OPPOSED to any changes to the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74613

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed redesignation of land under the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan 019-6218 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the removal of any lands from the designated Oak Ridges moraine lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74753

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against the removal of all the proposed areas of land from the green belt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74788

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The government should leave the Oak Ridges Moraine Intact and look for quickly developable lands elsewhere within urban boundaries. The Oak Ridges Moraine and it's lands are more ecologically and agriculturally valuable than ever, especially because of development pressures. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74866

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The nature of this redesignation was never discussed during the recent election. This government promised numerous times that they would not touch the Greenbelt or the Oak Ridges Moraine. Lire davantage