Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100460

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop supporting developers and reducing environmental protections.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100462

Commentaire fait au nom

PLATFORM Insurance Management

Statut du commentaire

This is great proposal that demonstrates the province of Ontario's willingness to create an improved business environment for developers and homebuilders, which will be of great help in the push to add to the housing supply. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100476

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please make it harder for developers to destroy wetlands and forests.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100478

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We were advised by legal council and our banking representatives to refuse acceptance of surety bonds as collecting from them is difficult. At the very least, a significant percentage (25%?) should be covered by cash or letter of credit. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100484

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a planning and land development consultant working for two different land owners in Brampton on Queen Street. Municipal and Regional Planning Staff have passed a Precinct Plan designating a variety of Primary MTSAs and recommendations thereof for Density and Heights. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100583

Commentaire fait au nom

Federation of South Toronto Residents Associations (FoSTRA)

Statut du commentaire

Infrastructure Ontario has at times conveyed to members of our 29 Resident Associations across downtown Toronto some of its intentions regarding infrastructure and community benefits for TOCs along the Ontario Line. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100600

Commentaire fait au nom

London Development Institute

Statut du commentaire

Letter of support of changes to s70.3.1 of the Planning Act regarding the use of Surety Bonds. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100678

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Burlington

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the City of Burlington, thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on Enabling the Use of Pay-on-Demand Surety Bonds to Secure Land-Use Planning Obligations under Sections 70.3.1 of the Planning Act. Please see the attached documents for the municipality's submitted comments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100687

Commentaire fait au nom

Township of Scugog

Statut du commentaire

I took the attached report and comment on ERO 019-9198 to Council for their endorsement on October 8th. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100787

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

October 9, 2024 ERO Number: 019-9198 Ruchi Parkash, Director, Municipal Finance Policy Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 17th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 2J3 Dear Director Parkash: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100896

Commentaire fait au nom

Regional Municipality of York

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached, York Region’s submission to the Environmental Registry of Ontario #019-9198, on the proposed regulatory framework in support of pay-on-demand surety bonds to secure infrastructure obligations under section 70.3.1 of the Planning Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100948

Commentaire fait au nom

Peel Region

Statut du commentaire

Peel Region's comments are submitted via the attached letter. Key points include requests for: - assurances that municipalities will receive complete and timely payment from the bond product, and the ability to rectify a deficiency without objection from the landowner/homebuilder Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100969

Commentaire fait au nom

Municipal Finance Officers' Association of Ontario

Statut du commentaire

RE: Enabling the Use of Pay-on-Demand Surety Bonds to Secure Land-Use Planning Obligations under Section 70.3.1 of the Planning Act (ERO 019-9198) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100984

Commentaire fait au nom

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Statut du commentaire

Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on ‘Enabling the Use of Pay-on-Demand Surety Bonds to Secure Land-Use Planning Obligations under Section 70.3.1 of the Planning Act’ (ERO 019 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100993

Commentaire fait au nom

Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached a letter from AMO President Robin Jones regarding the open call for consultation on the proposal corresponding to ERO Number 019-9198 on Surety Bonds. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

101004

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop making it easier for developers to destroy greenspace and wetlands by giving them financial incentives to do so!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

101018

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Waterloo

Statut du commentaire

With the Province consulting on a proposed regulation on Pay-on-Demand surety bonds to be used to secure certain obligations that are conditions of land use planning approvals, staff at the City of Waterloo have prepared the following comments. Lire davantage