Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100471

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Yes please implement these provisions as quickly as possible. Better late than never.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100472

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a fantastic idea. Angular planes, in particular, make construction very complicated. All these measures would save new ARUs from months of regulatory red tape by removing the need for minor variances and rezoning Strongly in favour

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100473

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Good ideas. Get rid of FSI, angular planes and those obscene set back requirements. FULL SPEED AHEAD! A rare well done from me

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100475

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I was wanting to build a garden suite in my house, but the angle plane laws, % of lot and height make it very difficult to build a garden suite that is desirable space. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100477

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building up/vertical building saves lands, as well as reusing spaces like garages as homes. It is especially good for people with disabilities. It gives independence while staying close to family. Please promote the protection of nature when building homes.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100482

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not sure, if this proposal has taken in consideration that an existing single family dwelling having two additional suites within the main building will change the occupancy from a single family dwelling or house to a apartment building as Ontario Building Code (OBC) underlines through differen Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100483

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Would like to see elimination of all parking requirements for ARUs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100485

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to submit a comment on the proposed ARU regulations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100487

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a homeowner, I am writing in support of the proposed changes to the performance standards governing ARUs. Existing zoning bylaws can be overly restrictive, adding unnecessary cost, and yielding highly inefficient floorplans. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100488

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a terrible idea. Eliminating the angular plane restriction and the minimum separation means that a neighbor could build a large laneway suite that looks directly into the yard and house of their neighbour. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100489

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Absolutely support the proposal and anything to fix the problem that causes the city to unjustly crack down on what people can do in their own homes and lots. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100490

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposed changed to the planning act is a very dangerous one. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100491

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly agree with any regulation that will reduce red tape and make it easier to build homes of all kinds.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100493

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A maximum separation of distance of 4 metres between a primary residence and an ARU in a detached structure seems small. Our municipality's zoning by-law allows for up to 30 metre separation and we've had variance applications to increase that.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100498

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the removal of the angular plane requirements for ADU buildings. I have been struggling to make a second story work for my garden suite in my back yard as we are trying to maintain a garage for parking my car which is an EV and requires a charger. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100504

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the regulations to make it easier to add ARU's in urban areas. I am an architect who has done laneway suites and basement suites in Toronto. I have a couple of concerns about the changes: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100508

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building a secondary dwelling on an already built place is a great idea for accessibility. A person can live more independently but still get access to support. But there should still be protections for trees and wetlands.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100513

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Province should review and consider similar changes to the Niagara Escarpment Plan (NEP). Currently the NEP does NOT permit ARU's in detached buildings, only within primary dwellings in specific land use designations. Lire davantage