Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100515

Commentaire fait au nom

Sundial Homes

Statut du commentaire

This update seems to be intended towards the infill-type ARU scenario, despite capturing (perhaps unintentionally), all residential lots with proper servicing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100523

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In principle, I agree with the ideas set out in this proposal. However, I am concerned that this policy does not adequately consider the need for sewage upgrades in municipalities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100527

Commentaire fait au nom

Bureau of Architectural Design & Urbanism Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Parking Requirements: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Some general comments. The proposal reflects a 'cookie-cutter approach' to zoning that is not appropriate for the varied conditions of lower density lots in communities across Ontario. Zoning regulations should be set relative to the unique circumstances found in various sized settlements. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100550

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you, these are good, common sense changes that will help us make better use of our urban areas.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100552

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The removal of parking requirements, while potentially allowing additional ARUs, will likely cause additional parking on streets. The parking reduction will not eliminate the number of vehicles, but rather, make this more of an issue of on-street parking. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100553

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m writing to express my support for the proposed policy changes, particularly the removal of angular plane requirements and the simplification of rules around lot size and building placement. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100554

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Additional items that would be helpful in building Garden Suites should include the following: - eliminate the inclusion of basements in the calculated area of a Garden Suite Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100555

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support this proposal. The angular plane requirements are onerous and counter productive to the goal of more housing units.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100567

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building distance seperation of 4 meters is too close!! This will severely impact privacy of neighbors and potentially block sky views and sunlight.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100569

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The province needs to realise that there is other applicable law than the Planning Act or Zoning By-laws. The Ontario Building code requires minimum distances between buildings for the regulation of glazing and fire transfer between buildings. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100591

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live in London, Ontario, in area identified as a near campus neighbourhood. We desperately need more housing in our city, especially in neighbourhoods where people want to live. Neighbourhoods with transit, hospitals and a large University. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100592

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. Increased Density and Strain on Infrastructure Overburdening of Public Services: Adding additional residential units may place a strain on existing infrastructure, including water supply, sewage, waste management, and transportation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100594

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This makes so much sense and would enable the cost effective creation of additional housing that is liveable.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100595

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If people would like to copy and paste this in their comment, please feel free to. Not that formal but this is what I am writing: Hello, Thank you for proposing these extremely necessary changes to ADUs. I along with many others in Toronto strongly agree with these changes: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100598

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In reading through all of the proposals here we do not see ONE thing that PROTECTS existing, established neighborhoods from developers who swoop in and have only ONE thing in mind....make as much money as possible. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100677

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, Thank you for proposing these extremely necessary changes to ADUs. I along with many others in Toronto strongly agree with these changes: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

100956

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Milton

Statut du commentaire

The Town of Milton approved as of right zoning for up to three additional residential units, for a total of four units on a lot, in June, 2024. The Town’s by-law is based on extensive community and stakeholder consultation. Lire davantage