Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

142932

Commentaire fait au nom

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see attached letter outlining comments from the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143097

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a student of archaeology, I have learned about how important our heritage is and those of everyone around us. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143126

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I oppose Bill C-5. I oppose overriding the law in special economic zones. I am a deeply concerned citizen worried about Bill 5. This bill would lead to unemployment in Environment Assessment and Cultural Resource Management (CRM) archaeology. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143159

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Bill 5's proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act pave the way for the destruction of Indigenous burial grounds and significant archaeological sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143222

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am concerned about the powers to exempt projects from archaeological assessments in favour of expediting provincial economic priorities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143292

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Archaeological requirements are not red tape. Good archaeology does not have to cause delays and should be viewed as an asset to any project. When brought in early, archaeologists can employ sophisticated predictive modelling and screening techniques to help avoid and protect critical Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143317

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I find what this bill is attempting to do a insult to Ontario. Heritage and the environment are not red tape. Giving the government the ability to circumvent these protections in the guise of capitol gains is truthfully disrespectful to what people in Ontario feel is important. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143345

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Provincial priority is no excuse for not doing archaeological assessment or protecting heritage sites. This legislation is flawed and should not go forward. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143413

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I think there are some good points to be made about having enchanted authority with Investigators on archaeological sites. We have been asking for years why the MCM is never on archaeological sites. Especially when the site is being destroyed by negligent developers and crown corporations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143728

Commentaire fait au nom

Legal Advocates for Nature's Defence

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Attached please find Legal Advocates for Nature's Defence's comments in response to Proposed Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act, Schedule 7 of the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025 (ERO No. 025-0418). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143749

Commentaire fait au nom

Federation of Urban Neighbourhoods (Ontario)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Schedule 7 of Bill 5 proposes to exempt developments from archaeological assessments if the Ontario government is of the opinion that an exemption “could potentially advance one or more of the following provincial priorities”: ● Transit; ● Housing; ● Health and Long-Term Care; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143810

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This bill risks the destruction of First Nation burial sites, artifacts and lands because developments are exempted from ecological and archaeological assessments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143817

Commentaire fait au nom

Bruce County

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Bruce County supports the provincial interest and objectives in streamlining approvals to get projects done – in the right way. In this spirit we offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Bill 5 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

143928

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Attawapiskat First Nation (“AFN”) has concerns with certain elements of the proposal to amend the Ontario Heritage Act (“OHA”) as part of Schedule 7 of Bill 5: Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Concerns Regarding Proposed Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (Bill 5) Dear Mr. McGregor, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144053

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Tay Valley Council submits the following comments about Schedule 7 of Bill 5 – Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, 2025. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144153

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to strongly oppose Bill 5: the Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act and its dangerous proposals, including the creation of Special Economic Zones, the weakening of Ontario’s endangered species protections, ignoring archaeological sites, and the exemption of the Eagle’s Nest min Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144176

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Kindly see our comments in the attached document with respect to the Proposed Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act, Schedule 7 of the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

144356

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I OPPOSE bill 5, it violates indigenous treaty rights, and threatens thousands of Ontario jobs, including archaeologists under LiUNA Local 3000.