Commentaire
Firstly, land designated as a part of a provincial park is indented to protect the land and maintain habitat for already vulnerable and at risk species. It is also intended to protect the land for future generations. Transferring ownership of so much of the beach area to the MTCG will NOT protect this land and will potentially lead to its development noting the Historical Parks Act does not have the same level of land/habitat protection woven into it.
Secondly, this is a slippery slope which may open the door to changes to other provincial parks with negative consequences.
I really hope this proposal is not accepted. It is not escaping me that Collingwood and Wasaga beach area has seen a huge shift in retirees moving there, especially from the GTA, and this appears to be a creative way to open up additional land and prime beach front for development.
Soumis le 10 août 2025 2:33 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications législatives proposées à la Loi de 2006 sur les parcs provinciaux et les réserves de conservation et à la Loi sur les parcs historiques pour appuyer la proposition d’amélioration du tourisme de la Ville de Wasaga Beach
Numéro du REO
025-0694
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
156151
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire